首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research >A biomechanical comparison study of a modern fibular nail and distal fibular locking plate in AO/OTA 44C2 ankle fractures
【2h】

A biomechanical comparison study of a modern fibular nail and distal fibular locking plate in AO/OTA 44C2 ankle fractures

机译:现代腓骨钉与腓骨远端锁定板在AO / OTA 44C2踝部骨折中的生物力学比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundA lateral approach with open reduction and internal fixation with a plate is a very effective technique for the majority of distal fibular fractures. However, this open approach for ankle fixation may be complicated by wound dehiscence and infection, especially in high-risk patients. An alternative to plating is an intramedullary implant, which allows maintenance of length, alignment, and rotation and which allows for decreased soft tissue dissection. While there has been clinical data suggesting favorable short-term outcomes with these implants, there is no current biomechanical literature investigating this technology in this particular fracture pattern. This study sought to biomechanically compare an emerging technology with an established method of fixation for distal fibular fractures that traditionally require an extensive exposure.
机译:背景对于大多数远端腓骨骨折,采用切开复位钢板内固定的外侧入路是一种非常有效的技术。但是,这种开放式的踝关节固定方法可能会因伤口裂开和感染而变得复杂,尤其是在高危患者中。电镀的替代方法是髓内植入物,它可以保持长度,对齐和旋转,并可以减少软组织解剖。尽管已有临床数据表明这些植入物具有良好的短期效果,但目前尚无生物力学文献对此特定骨折类型进行研究。这项研究试图以生物力学的方式将新兴技术与既定的固定远端腓骨骨折的固定方法进行比较,而这些方法通常需要大量暴露。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号