首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Antioxidants >Comparative Examination of Antioxidant Capacity and Fingerprinting of Unfractionated Extracts from Different Plant Parts of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) Grown under Greenhouse Conditions
【2h】

Comparative Examination of Antioxidant Capacity and Fingerprinting of Unfractionated Extracts from Different Plant Parts of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) Grown under Greenhouse Conditions

机译:温室条件下藜麦(Chenopodium quinoa)不同植物部位未分级提取物的抗氧化能力和指纹图谱的比较检查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Integrated surveys of metabolic profiles and antioxidant capacity from Chenopodium quinoa have been limited and have particularly focused on an examination of seeds and leaves. According to this, the main aim of the present study was to address an evaluation of the antioxidant activity of crude ethanolic extracts from different plant parts (leaves, stems, roots, flowers, and seeds) harvested at different times during growth and processed by two distinct drying methods: Air-drying and freeze-drying. In order to characterize the resulting extracts, the total content of phenolics (TPC) and flavonoids (TFC) was then measured through the Folin–Ciocalteu method, while antioxidant capacity was determined using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging and ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) methods. Parallel to this evaluation, extracts were profiled by LC-DAD-ESI-MS. Data analysis was supported by statistics. Most of the extracts obtained from freeze-dried samples showed higher TPC values ranging from 6.02 to 43.47 milligram of gallic acid equivalents per gram of plant material and a TFC between 1.30 and 12.26 milligram of quercetin equivalents per gram of plant material. After statistical analysis, a low correlation between TPC and TFC values was observed regarding antioxidant capacity from DPPH and FRAP measurements of both drying methods. A multivariate analysis showed that antioxidant components and antioxidant capacity in C. quinoa changed during growth and between plant parts and drying methods. These changes need to be taken into consideration when comparing the production/accumulation of beneficial bioactive compounds in this pseudocereal.
机译:藜藜藜的代谢特征和抗氧化能力的综合调查是有限的,并且特别侧重于检查种子和叶片。据此,本研究的主要目的是评估在生长期间的不同时间收获并由两个人加工的不同植物部位(叶,茎,根,花和种子)的粗乙醇提取物的抗氧化活性。独特的干燥方法:风干和冷冻干燥。为了表征所得提取物,然后通过Folin–Ciocalteu方法测量了酚类(TPC)和类黄酮(TFC)的总含量,同时使用2,2-二苯基-1-picylhydrazyl(DPPH )清除自由基和还原铁的抗氧化能力(FRAP)方法。与该评估平行,通过LC-DAD-ESI-MS分析提取物。数据分析得到了统计的支持。从冷冻干燥样品中获得的大多数提取物显示出更高的TPC值,范围从每克植物材料6.02到43.47毫克没食子酸当量,而TFC在每克植物材料中1.30到12.26毫克槲皮素当量。经过统计分析,从两种干燥方法的DPPH和FRAP测量得出的抗氧化能力方面,TPC和TFC值之间的相关性较低。多元分析表明,藜麦中的抗氧化剂成分和抗氧化能力在生长过程中以及在植物部位和干燥方法之间发生了变化。在比较该假谷物中有益生物活性化合物的产生/积累时,需要考虑这些变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号