首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Neuroscience >Abstract and Effector-Selective Decision Signals Exhibit Qualitatively Distinct Dynamics before Delayed Perceptual Reports
【2h】

Abstract and Effector-Selective Decision Signals Exhibit Qualitatively Distinct Dynamics before Delayed Perceptual Reports

机译:摘要和效应器选择决策信号在延迟的感知报告之前展现出质的不同动态

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Electrophysiological research has isolated neural signatures of decision formation in a variety of brain regions. Studies in rodents and monkeys have focused primarily on effector-selective signals that translate the emerging decision into a specific motor plan, but, more recently, research on the human brain has identified an abstract signature of evidence accumulation that does not appear to play any direct role in action preparation. The functional dissociations between these distinct signal types have only begun to be characterized, and their dynamics during decisions with deferred actions with or without foreknowledge of stimulus-effector mapping, a commonly studied task scenario in single-unit and functional imaging investigations, have not been established. Here we traced the dynamics of distinct abstract and effector-selective decision signals in the form of the broad-band centro-parietal positivity (CPP) and limb-selective β-band (8–16 and 18–30 Hz) EEG activity, respectively, during delayed-reported motion direction decisions with and without foreknowledge of direction-response mapping. With foreknowledge, the CPP and β-band signals exhibited a similar gradual build-up following evidence onset, but whereas choice-predictive β-band activity persisted up until the delayed response, the CPP dropped toward baseline after peaking. Without foreknowledge, the CPP exhibited identical dynamics, whereas choice-selective β-band activity was eliminated. These findings highlight qualitative functional distinctions between effector-selective and abstract decision signals and are of relevance to the assumptions founding functional neuroimaging investigations of decision-making.>SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Neural signatures of evidence accumulation have been isolated in numerous brain regions. Although animal neurophysiology has largely concentrated on effector-selective decision signals that translate the emerging decision into a specific motor plan, recent research on the human brain has isolated abstract neural signatures of decision formation that are independent of specific sensory and motor requirements. Here, we examine the functional distinctions between the two distinct classes of decision variable signal during decisions with deferred actions with and without foreknowledge of stimulus-effector mapping. We find salient distinctions in the dynamics of abstract versus effector-selective decision signals in the human brain, in terms of sustainment through response delays and contingency on foreknowledge of stimulus–response mapping.
机译:电生理学研究已经隔离了大脑各个区域中决策形成的神经信号。对啮齿动物和猴子的研究主要集中在效应子选择性信号上,这些信号将新出现的决定转化为特定的运动计划,但是最近,对人脑的研究发现了证据积累的抽象特征,似乎没有发挥任何直接作用。在行动准备中的作用。这些不同信号类型之间的功能分离只是开始被表征,并且在有或没有预知刺激效应器映射的情况下,在采取延迟行动的决策过程中,它们的动力学尚未被发现。在单个单元和功能成像研究中,这是一种经常研究的任务场景。成立。在这里,我们以宽带中心顶叶阳性(CPP)和肢体选择性β波段(8–16和18–30 Hz)脑电活动的形式分别追踪了不同的抽象信号和效应器选择性决策信号的动力学。 ,在延迟报告的运动方向决策中,带有或不带有方向响应映射的知识。有了先知,在证据开始后,CPP和β波段信号表现出相似的逐渐累积,但是预测选择的β波段活动持续到延迟响应,而CPP在达到峰值后下降到基线。没有预知,CPP表现出相同的动力学,而选择选择性的β波段活性被消除。这些发现突显了效应物选择信号和抽象决策信号之间的定性功能区别,与建立决策功能神经影像学研究的假设有关。地区。尽管动物神经生理学主要集中于效应器选择性决策信号,这些信号将新出现的决策转化为特定的运动计划,但最近对人脑的研究已经分离出决策形成的抽象神经信号,而这些信号独立于特定的感觉和运动要求。在这里,我们研究了在有或没有预知刺激效应器映射的情况下,具有延迟动作的决策过程中,决策变量信号的两个不同类之间的功能区别。我们发现,在人类大脑中,抽象与决策者选择性决策信号动力学的显着区别在于,通过响应延迟的持续性和对刺激-响应映射的预先了解的偶然性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号