首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Neuroscience >Dynamics of EEG Rhythms Support Distinct Visual Selection Mechanisms in Parietal Cortex: A Simultaneous Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and EEG Study
【2h】

Dynamics of EEG Rhythms Support Distinct Visual Selection Mechanisms in Parietal Cortex: A Simultaneous Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and EEG Study

机译:脑电节律动力学支持顶叶皮层不同的视觉选择机制:同时经颅磁刺激和脑电图研究。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), we have recently shown a functional anatomical distinction in human parietal cortex between regions involved in maintaining attention to a location [ventral intraparietal sulcus (vIPS)] and a region involved in shifting attention between locations [medial superior parietal lobule (mSPL)]. In particular, while rTMS interference over vIPS impaired target discrimination at contralateral attended locations, interference over mSPL affected performance following shifts of attention regardless of the visual field (). Here, using rTMS interference in conjunction with EEG recordings of brain rhythms during the presentation of cues that indicate to either shift or maintain spatial attention, we tested whether this functional anatomical segregation involves different mechanisms of rhythm synchronization. The transient inactivation of vIPS reduced the amplitude of the expected parieto-occipital low-α (8–10 Hz) desynchronization contralateral to the cued location. Conversely, the transient inactivation of mSPL, compared with vIPS, reduced the high-α (10–12 Hz) desynchronization induced by shifting attention into both visual fields. Furthermore, rTMS induced a frequency-specific delay of task-related modulation of brain rhythms. Specifically, rTMS over vIPS or mSPL during maintenance (stay cues) or shifting (shift cues) of spatial attention, respectively, caused a delay of α parieto-occipital desynchronization. Moreover, rTMS over vIPS during stay cues caused a delay of δ (2–4 Hz) frontocentral synchronization. These findings further support the anatomo-functional subdivision of the dorsal attention network in subsystems devoted to shifting or maintaining covert visuospatial attention and indicate that these mechanisms operate in different frequency channels linking frontal to parieto-occipital visual regions.
机译:使用重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS),我们最近显示了在人顶叶皮层中,在保持关注位置的区域[腹侧顶内沟(vIPS)]和在位置之间转移注意力的区域[中上层]之间的功能解剖区别顶叶(mSPL)]。特别是,尽管rTMS对vIPS的干扰削弱了对侧就诊位置的目标辨别力,但对mSPL的干扰影响了注意力转移后的性能,而与视野无关()。在这里,在提示提示转移或保持空间注意力的提示过程中,将rTMS干扰与脑节律的EEG记录结合使用,我们测试了此功能性解剖隔离是否涉及节律同步的不同机制。 vIPS的瞬时失活降低了提示位置对侧预期的顶枕低α(8-10 Hz)失步的幅度。相反,与vIPS相比,mSPL的瞬时失活减少了将注意力转移到两个视野中引起的高α(10-12 Hz)失步。此外,rTMS引起与任务有关的脑节律调制的频率特定的延迟。具体来说,在保持空间注意力(停留提示)或移动注意力(转移提示)期间,vTM或mSPL上的rTMS分别导致了α顶枕-枕骨不同步的延迟。此外,在停留提示期间基于vIPS的rTMS导致δ(2-4 Hz)额中央同步的延迟。这些发现进一步支持了背侧注意力网络在致力于转移或保持隐性视觉空间注意力的子系统中的解剖功能细分,并表明这些机制在连接额叶与顶枕视觉区域的不同频率通道中起作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号