【2h】

What do territory owners defend against?

机译:地主如何防御?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Theoretical research on evolutionary aspects of territoriality has a long history. Existing studies, however, differ widely in modelling approach and research question. A generalized view on the evolution of territoriality is accordingly still missing. In this review, we show that territorial conflicts can be classified into qualitatively distinct types according to what mode of access to a territory which competitor attempts to gain. We argue that many of the inconsistencies between existing studies can be traced back to the fact that, while using the same terminology, different instances of these types of conflicts have been investigated. We discuss the connections of each type of conflict to existing research within the wider area of animal conflicts. We conclude that a clear conceptual separation of different types of territorial conflicts is helpful but that a more general theory of territoriality has to account for interdependencies between them and that a more mechanistic approach to modelling territoriality is needed.
机译:关于领土演化方面的理论研究已有悠久的历史。但是,现有研究在建模方法和研究问题上存在很大差异。因此,关于地域性演变的普遍看法仍然缺失。在这篇评论中,我们表明,根据竞争者试图获得的进入领土的方式,可以将领土冲突划分为性质上不同的类型。我们认为,现有研究之间的许多不一致之处可以追溯到这样一个事实,即在使用相同术语的同时,已经研究了这类冲突的不同情况。我们将讨论每种冲突类型与现有动物冲突研究之间的联系。我们得出的结论是,将不同类型的领土冲突在概念上进行清楚的分离是有帮助的,但是更普遍的领土理论必须考虑到它们之间的相互依赖性,因此需要一种更为机械的方法来建模领土。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号