首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences >Understanding the value of plant diversity for ecosystem functioning through niche theory
【2h】

Understanding the value of plant diversity for ecosystem functioning through niche theory

机译:通过利基理论了解植物多样性对生态系统功能的价值

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Biodiversity experiments have generated robust empirical results supporting the hypothesis that ecosystems function better when they contain more species. Given that ecosystems provide services that are valued by humans, this inevitably suggests that the loss of species from natural ecosystems could diminish their value. This raises two important questions. First, will experimental results translate into the real world, where species are being lost at an alarming rate? And second, what are the benefits and pitfalls of such valuation exercises? We argue that the empirical results obtained in experiments are entirely consistent with well-established theories of species coexistence. We then examine the current body of work through the lens of niche theory and highlight where closer links with theory could open up opportunities for future research. We argue that niche theory predicts that diversity–functioning relationships are likely to be stronger (and require more species) in the field than in simplified experimental settings. However, we caution that while many of the biological processes that promote coexistence can also generate diversity–function relationships, there is no simple mapping between the two. This implies that valuation exercises need to proceed with care.
机译:生物多样性实验产生了可靠的经验结果,支持了以下假设:生态系统包含更多物种时,其功能会更好。鉴于生态系统所提供的服务是人类所珍视的,这不可避免地表明自然生态系统中物种的丧失可能会降低其价值。这就提出了两个重要的问题。首先,实验结果会转化为现实世界吗?在现实世界中,物种的流失速度惊人。其次,这种估值活动有什么好处和陷阱?我们认为,在实验中获得的经验结果与建立的物种共存理论完全一致。然后,我们通过利基理论的角度考察当前的工作范围,并强调与理论的更紧密联系可以为未来的研究提供机会。我们认为利基理论预测,与简化的实验环境相比,田间多样性与功能的关系可能更强(并需要更多物种)。但是,我们提醒您,尽管许多促进共存的生物过程也可以产生多样性与功能的关系,但两者之间并没有简单的映射。这意味着评估工作需要谨慎进行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号