首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Biophysics and Physicobiology >The binding structure and affinity of photodamaged duplex DNA with members of the photolyase/cryptochrome family: A computational study
【2h】

The binding structure and affinity of photodamaged duplex DNA with members of the photolyase/cryptochrome family: A computational study

机译:光损伤的双链DNA与光裂解酶/隐色素家族成员的结合结构和亲和力:一项计算研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Photolyases (PHRs) and cryptochromes (CRYs) belong to the same family known as blue-light photoreceptors. Although their amino acid sequences and corresponding structures are similar to each other, they exert different functions. PHRs function as an enzyme to repair UV-induced deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) lesions such as a cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) and a (6-4) photoproduct ((6-4)pp), whereas CRYs are a circadian photoreceptor in plants and animals and at the same time they control the photoperiodic induction of flowering in plants. When a new type cryptochrome was identified, it was assumed that another type of CRYs, cryptochrome-DASH (CRY-DASH), which is categorized as a subfamily of photolyase/cryptochrome family, would possess the DNA photolyase activity. However, CRY-DASH had a weak DNA photolyase activity, but the reason for this is still unclear. To clarify the reason, we performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for a complex of CPD-PHR or CRY-DASH with damaged double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and estimated the binding free energy, ΔGbind, between the protein and the damaged dsDNA by using a molecular mechanics/Poisson–Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) method. ΔGbind for both proteins were −35 and 57 kcal mol−1, respectively, indicating that the structural stability of CRY-DASH was lower than that of CPD-PHR upon the damaged dsDNA binding. In particular, the number of amino acid residues relevant to the damaged dsDNA binding on the CRY-DASH surface was smaller than that on CPD-PHR. Therefore, the present result suggests that CRY-DASH has a weak DNA photolyase activity because it has a lower binding affinity than CPD-PHR.
机译:光解酶(PHR)和隐色染料(CRY)属于蓝光感光体的同一家族。尽管它们的氨基酸序列和相应的结构彼此相似,但是它们发挥不同的功能。 PHRs可作为一种酶来修复UV诱导的脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)损伤,例如环丁烷嘧啶二聚体(CPD)和(6-4)光产物((6-4)pp),而CRYs是植物中的昼夜节律性受体。以及动物,与此同时,它们控制着植物在光周期中诱导开花。当鉴定出一种新型的隐色染料时,假定另一类CRY,即隐色染料-DASH(CRY-DASH),被归类为光裂解酶/隐色染料家族的一个亚科,将具有DNA光裂解酶活性。然而,CRY-DASH具有弱的DNA光裂解酶活性,但是其原因尚不清楚。为了阐明原因,我们对CPD-PHR或CRY-DASH与受损的双链DNA(dsDNA)的复合物进行了分子动力学(MD)模拟,并通过以下方法估算了蛋白质与受损的dsDNA之间的结合自由能ΔGbind使用分子力学/泊松-玻尔兹曼表面积(MM / PBSA)方法。两种蛋白质的ΔGbind分别为-35和57 kcal mol -1 ,表明当dsDNA结合受损时,CRY-DASH的结构稳定性低于CPD-PHR。特别地,与在CRY-DASH表面上的受损dsDNA结合有关的氨基酸残基的数量小于在CPD-PHR上的氨基酸残基的数量。因此,本结果表明CRY-DASH具有比CPD-PHR低的结合亲和力,因此其DNA光解酶活性弱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号