首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Cardiovascular Disorders >Fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multi-vessel disease patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review
【2h】

Fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multi-vessel disease patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review

机译:急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死和多支血管疾病患者的分数血流储备指导的完全血运重建与仅罪犯的血运重建:荟萃分析和系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundApproximately 30–50% patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STMEI) were found to have non-infarct-related coronary artery (IRA) disease, which was significantly associated with worse prognosis. However, challenges still remain for these patients: which non-infarct-related lesion should be treated and when should the procedure be performed? The present study aims to investigate Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided complete revascularization (CR) in comparison to culprit-only revascularization (COR) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multi-vessel disease (MVD).
机译:背景大约30–50%的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STMEI)患者被发现患有非梗死相关性冠状动脉(IRA)疾病,这与预后差有关。但是,这些患者仍然面临挑战:应该治疗哪些非梗塞相关病变,何时应进行手术?本研究的目的是与ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)和多支血管疾病(MVD)患者相比,仅用分数流量储备(FFR)指导的完全血运重建(CR)进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号