首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Chemistry >Two novel UPLC methods utilizing two different analytical columns and different detection approaches for the simultaneous analysis of velpatasvir and sofosbuvir: application to their co-formulated tablet
【2h】

Two novel UPLC methods utilizing two different analytical columns and different detection approaches for the simultaneous analysis of velpatasvir and sofosbuvir: application to their co-formulated tablet

机译:两种新颖的UPLC方法利用两个不同的分析柱和不同的检测方法同时进行维帕他韦和索非布韦的分析:在其共同配制的片剂中的应用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the present study two different RSLC columns, Acclaim RSLC 120 C18, 5.0 µm, 4.6 × 150 mm (column A) and Acclaim RSLC 120 C18, 2.2 µm, 2.1 × 100 mm (Column B) were utilized for the analysis of velpatasvir (VPS) in presence of sofosbuvir (SFV), where due to the encountered fluorescent properties of VPS fluorescent detection at 405 nm after excitation at 340 nm (Method 1) was used for its detection where the non-fluorescent SFV did not interfere. The same columns were further utilized for the simultaneous determination of SFV and VPS either in bulk form or in their combined tablet, where UV- spectrophotometric detection at 260 nm was selected for the simultaneous analysis of both drugs (Method 2). A mobile phase consisting of NaH2PO4, pH 2.5 (with phosphoric acid) and acetonitrile in a ratio of 60:40 v/v was used for both methods. The mobile phase was pumped at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min when using column, A and 0.5 mL/min when using column B. The methods showed good linearity over the concentration ranges of 1.0–5.0 and 2.5–10.0 ng/mL for VPS when utilizing Method 1 A and B respectively. Where the linearity concentration range was from 30.0–150.0 to 120–600.0 ng/mL for VPS and SFV respectively when applying Method 2. Both methods 1 and 2 were performed by utilizing the two analytical columns. The different chromatographic parameters as retention time, resolution, number of theoretical plates (N), capacity factor, tailing factor and selectivity were carefully optimized. The results show that comparing the performance of the two utilized columns revealed that shorter column (2.1 mm × 100 mm) with small particle packing was superior to the longer column (4.6 × 150 mm) for the analysis of the studied drugs allowing a reduction of the analysis time by 70% without any detrimental effect on performance. This prompts the decrease of the investigation costs by saving money on organic solvents and expanding the overall number of analyses per day.
机译:在本研究中,两个不同的RSLC色谱柱,Acclaim RSLC 120 C18,5.0μm,4.6××150 mm(A柱)和Acclaim RSLC 120 C18,2.2μm,2.1××100 mm(B柱)用于velpatasvir( (VPS)存在sofosbuvir(SFV),由于在340 nm激发后在405 nm处检测到VPS的荧光特性(方法1),因此使用了sofosbuvir(SFV)来检测其非荧光SFV不会产生干扰。相同的色谱柱还可用于散装形式或组合片剂形式的同时测定SFV和VPS的方法,其中选择了260 nm的紫外分光光度法进行两种药物的同时分析(方法2)。两种方法均使用由NaH2PO4,pH 2.5(含磷酸)和乙腈(比例为60:40 v / v)组成的流动相。当使用色谱柱时,流动相以1.0mL / min的流速泵送,使用色谱柱B时以0.5mL / min的流速泵送。方法在1.0–5.0和2.5–10.0ng / mL的浓度范围内显示出良好的线性分别使用方法1 A和B时的VPS。应用方法2时,VPS和SFV的线性浓度范围分别为30.0–150.0至120–600.0 ng / mL。方法1和方法2均使用两个分析柱进行。仔细优化了不同的色谱参数,如保留时间,分离度,理论塔板数(N),容量因子,拖尾因子和选择性。结果表明,比较使用的两种色谱柱的性能发现,较短的色谱柱(2.1mm××100mm)和小颗粒填料比较长的色谱柱(4.6×150mm)在分析所研究药物方面要好一些,从而减少了分析时间减少了70%,而对性能没有任何不利影响。通过节省有机溶剂费用并增加每天的总分析次数,可以降低调查成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号