首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Physical Therapy Science >Comparing the interface pressure redistribution after applying threedifferent types of cushions: differences according to cushion type
【2h】

Comparing the interface pressure redistribution after applying threedifferent types of cushions: differences according to cushion type

机译:比较三种应用后界面压力的重新分布不同类型的坐垫:根据坐垫类型的不同

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to compare the interface pressure redistribution when sitting after applying three different types of cushions and on a firm surface in individuals in their 20s and those older than 60 years old. [Subjects and Methods] Healthy 100 elderly (60 years and older) subjects and 111 college students participated in this study. Interface pressure redistribution while sitting on a firm surface or honeycomb, air, and memory foam cushions, examined in that order. [Results] For all groups, significant differences were found in the total pressure mean among sitting states. When the hip and thigh interface pressure among sitting states were compared within each group, significant differences were found in the mean right hip pressure, mean left hip pressure, peak right hip pressure, peak left hip pressure, right hip pressure ratio, and left hip pressure ratio. [Conclusion] Our data indicated that the type of cushion should be considered and fit for individuals when recommending appropriate interface pressure redistribution cushions.
机译:[目的]本研究的目的是比较20多岁和60岁以上年龄的人在应用三种不同类型的垫子之后坐着并在牢固的表面上坐着时的界面压力重新分布。 [对象与方法]健康的100名老年人(60岁及60岁以上)受试者和111名大学生参加了这项研究。坐在牢固的表面或蜂窝,空气和记忆泡沫垫上时,界面压力会重新分布,按此顺序进行检查。 [结果]对于所有组,坐姿之间的总压力平均值存在显着差异。当比较各组坐姿之间的髋部和大腿界面压力时,发现平均右髋压力,平均左髋压力,峰值右髋压力,峰值左髋压力,右髋压力比和左髋之间存在显着差异压力比。 [结论]我们的数据表明,在推荐合适的界面压力重新分配垫时,应考虑垫的类型并适合个人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号