首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Health Services Research >The impact of the ‘Better Care Better Value’ prescribing policy on the utilisation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for treating hypertension in the UK primary care setting: longitudinal quasi-experimental design
【2h】

The impact of the ‘Better Care Better Value’ prescribing policy on the utilisation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for treating hypertension in the UK primary care setting: longitudinal quasi-experimental design

机译:更好的护理更好的价值处方政策对英国初级保健机构中使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗高血压的影响:纵向准实验设计

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundIn April/2009, the UK National Health Service initiated four Better Care Better Value (BCBV) prescribing indicators, one of which encouraged the prescribing of cheaper angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) instead of expensive angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), with 80 % ACEIs/20 % ARBs as a proposed, and achievable target. The policy was intended to save costs without affecting patient outcomes. However, little is known about the actual impact of the BCBV indicator on ACEIs/ARBs utilisation and cost-savings. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of BCBV policy on ACEIs/ARBs utilisation and cost-savings, including exploration of regional variations of the policy’s impact.
机译:背景2009年4月,英国国家卫生服务局启动了四个更好的护理更好的价值(BCBV)处方指标,其中一项鼓励使用便宜的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)而不是昂贵的血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs),其中80 %ACEIs / 20%ARBs是拟议且可实现的目标。该政策旨在节省成本而又不影响患者预后。但是,关于BCBV指标对ACEI / ARB利用率和成本节省的实际影响知之甚少。因此,本研究旨在评估BCBV政策对ACEI / ARB的利用和成本节省的影响,包括探索该政策影响的区域差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号