首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Health Services Research >A comparative study of two various models of organising diabetes follow-up in public primary health care – the model influences the use of services their quality and costs
【2h】

A comparative study of two various models of organising diabetes follow-up in public primary health care – the model influences the use of services their quality and costs

机译:对两种组织公共初级卫生保健中的糖尿病随访模型的比较研究–该模型影响服务的使用服务质量和成本

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundIn Finland diabetologists have long been concerned about the level of diabetes care as the incidence of type 1 diabetes and complicated type 2 diabetes is exceeding the capacity of specialist clinics. We compared the outcome of diabetes care in two middle-sized Finnish municipalities with different models of diabetes care organisation in public primary health care. In Kouvola the primary health care of all diabetic patients is based on general practitioners, whereas in Nurmijärvi the follow-up of type 1 and most complicated type 2 diabetic patients is assigned to a general practitioner specialised in diabetes care.
机译:背景技术在芬兰,由于1型糖尿病和复杂2型糖尿病的发病率已超过专科门诊的能力,因此糖尿病患者长期以来一直在关注糖尿病的护理水平。我们将芬兰的两个中型城市的糖尿病护理结果与公共初级卫生保健中采用不同模型的糖尿病护理组织进行了比较。在科沃拉(Kouvola),所有糖尿病患者的主要卫生保健均以全科医生为基础,而在努尔米亚尔维(Nurmijärvi),将1型和最复杂的2型糖尿病患者的随访分配给专门从事糖尿病护理的全科医生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号