首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Health Services Research >Mandatory quality reports in Germany from the hospitals’ point of view: a cross-sectional observational study
【2h】

Mandatory quality reports in Germany from the hospitals’ point of view: a cross-sectional observational study

机译:从医院的角度看德国的强制性质量报告:一项横断面观察研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundPublic reporting of hospital quality is to enable providers, patients and the public to make comparisons regarding the quality of care and thus contribute to informed decisions. It stimulates quality improvement activities in hospitals and thus positively impacts treatment results. Hospitals often use publicly reported data for further internal or external purposes.As of 2005, German hospitals are obliged to publish structured quality reports (QR) every two years. This gives them the opportunity to demonstrate their performance by number, type and quality in a transparent way. However, it constitutes a major burden to hospitals to generate and publish data required, and it is yet unknown if hospitals feel adequately represented and at the same time consider the effort appropriate.This study assesses hospital leaders’ judgement about the capability of QR to put legally defined aims effectively and efficiently into practice. It also explores the additional purposes hospitals use their QR for.
机译:背景技术公开报告医院质量是为了使提供者,患者和公众能够就护理质量进行比较,从而有助于做出明智的决定。它刺激了医院的质量改进活动,从而对治疗结果产生积极影响。医院经常将公开报告的数据用于进一步的内部或外部目的。自2005年起,德国医院有义务每两年发布一次结构化质量报告(QR)。这使他们有机会以透明的方式按数量,类型和质量展示其性能。然而,这构成了医院产生和发布所需数据的主要负担,并且尚不清楚医院是否有足够的代表性并同时考虑了适当的努力。这项研究评估了医院领导对QR放置能力的判断。法律定义的目标有效而有效地付诸实践。它还探讨了医院使用QR的其他目的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号