首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Medicine >Two distinct Do-Not-Resuscitate protocols leaving less to the imagination: an observational study using propensity score matching
【2h】

Two distinct Do-Not-Resuscitate protocols leaving less to the imagination: an observational study using propensity score matching

机译:两种截然不同的不要复活规程使人们难以想象:使用倾向得分匹配的观察性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundDo-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) patients tend to receive less medical care after the order is written. To provide a clearer approach, the Ohio Department of Health adopted the Do-Not-Resuscitate law in 1998, indicating two distinct protocols of DNR orders that allow DNR patients to choose the medical care: DNR Comfort Care (DNRCC), implying DNRCC patients receive only comfort care after the order is written; and DNR Comfort Care-Arrest (DNRCC-Arrest), implying that DNRCC-Arrest patients are eligible to receive aggressive interventions until cardiac or respiratory arrest. The aim of this study was to examine the medical care provided to patients with these two distinct protocols of DNR orders.
机译:背景请勿在未签署书面通知后进行复苏的患者接受较少的医疗护理。为了提供更清晰的方法,俄亥俄州卫生部门于1998年通过了《禁止复苏法》,指出了两种不同的DNR命令协议,允许DNR患者选择医疗服务:DNR舒适护理(DNRCC),这意味着DNRCC患者可以接受订单签发后,仅提供舒适护理;和DNR舒适护理逮捕(DNRCC-逮捕),这意味着DNRCC-逮捕的患者有资格接受积极的干预,直到心脏或呼吸停止为止。这项研究的目的是检查使用两种不同的DNR订单方案为患者提供的医疗服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号