首页> 外文学位 >Using a Two-Stage Propensity Score Matching Strategy and Multilevel Modeling to Estimate Treatment Effects in a Multisite Observational Study.
【24h】

Using a Two-Stage Propensity Score Matching Strategy and Multilevel Modeling to Estimate Treatment Effects in a Multisite Observational Study.

机译:在多站点观察性研究中,使用两阶段倾向得分匹配策略和多级建模来估计治疗效果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this study I present, demonstrate, and test a method that extends the Stuart and Rubin (2008) multiple control group matching strategy to a multisite setting. Three primary phases define the proposed method: (1) a design phase, in which one uses a two-stage matching strategy to construct treatment and control groups that are well balanced along both unit- and site-level key pretreatment covariates; (2) an adjustment phase, in which the observed outcomes for non-local control group matches are adjusted to account for differences in the local and non-local matched control units; and (3) an analysis phase, in which one estimates average causal effects for the treated units and investigates heterogeneity in causal effects through multilevel modeling. The main novelty of the proposed method occurs in the design phase, where propensity score matching is executed in two stages. In the first stage, treatment units are matched to control units within the same site. In the second stage, treatment units without an acceptable within-site match are matched to control units in another site (between-site match). The two-stage matching method provides researchers with an alternative to strict within-site matching or matching that ignores the nested data structure (pooled matching). I employ an empirical illustration and a set of simulation studies to test the utility and feasibility of the proposed two-stage matching method. The results document the two-stage matching method's conceptual appeal, but indicate that effect estimation under the two-stage matching method does not, in general, outperform more traditional matching-based or regression-based methods. Alternative specifications within the proposed method can improve performance of two-stage matching. In addition to extending the work of Stuart and Rubin, this study complements the small set of studies that have examined propensity score matching in multisite settings and provides guidance for researchers looking to estimate treatment effects from a multisite observational study. The dissertation concludes with directions for future research and considerations for researchers conducting multisite observational studies.
机译:在本研究中,我介绍,演示和测试了将Stuart和Rubin(2008)多个对照组匹配策略扩展到多站点设置的方法。三个主要阶段定义了所提出的方法:(1)设计阶段,其中使用两阶段匹配策略来构建在单元和站点级别关键预处理协变量上均具有良好平衡的治疗组和对照组。 (2)调整阶段,其中对非本地对照组的观察结果进行调整,以解决本地和非本地匹配对照组的差异; (3)一个分析阶段,在该阶段中,估计了所处理单位的平均因果效应,并通过多级建模研究了因果效应的异质性。所提出方法的主要新颖之处在于设计阶段,其中倾向得分匹配分两个阶段执行。在第一阶段,治疗单元与同一地点的控制单元相匹配。在第二阶段中,将没有可接受的站点内匹配的处理单元与另一个站点中的控制单元进行匹配(站点间匹配)。两阶段匹配方法为研究人员提供了严格的站点内匹配或忽略嵌套数据结构(池匹配)的替代方法。我采用了经验例证和一组仿真研究来测试所提出的两阶段匹配方法的实用性和可行性。结果记录了两阶段匹配方法的概念吸引力,但表明两阶段匹配方法下的效果估计通常不优于传统的基于匹配或基于回归的方法。所提出的方法中的替代规范可以提高两阶段匹配的性能。除了扩展Stuart和Rubin的工作之外,本研究还补充了少数研究在多站点设置中倾向得分匹配的研究,并为希望通过多站点观察性研究估算治疗效果的研究人员提供指导。论文最后提出了未来研究的方向和进行多站点观测研究的研究人员的考虑。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rickles, Jordan Harry.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Los Angeles.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Los Angeles.;
  • 学科 Educational evaluation.;Social research.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 227 p.
  • 总页数 227
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号