首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making >Public preferences for engagement in Health Technology Assessment decision-making: protocol of a mixed methods study
【2h】

Public preferences for engagement in Health Technology Assessment decision-making: protocol of a mixed methods study

机译:公众参与卫生技术评估决策的偏爱:混合方法研究方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundMuch attention in recent years has been given to the topic of public engagement in health technology assessment (HTA) decision-making. HTA organizations spend substantial resources and time on undertaking public engagement, and numerous studies have examined challenges and barriers to engagement in the decision-making process however uncertainty remains as to optimal methods to incorporate the views of the public in HTA decision-making. Little research has been done to ascertain whether current engagement processes align with public preferences and to what extent their desire for engagement is dependent on the question being asked by decision-makers or the characteristics of the decision. This study will examine public preferences for engagement in Australian HTA decision-making using an exploratory mixed methods design.
机译:背景技术近年来,公众对卫生技术评估(HTA)决策的参与给予了极大关注。 HTA组织花费大量资源和时间进行公众参与,许多研究已经探讨了参与决策过程的挑战和障碍,但是在将公众观点纳入HTA决策的最佳方法方面仍然存在不确定性。很少进行研究来确定当前的参与过程是否符合公共偏好,以及他们参与的意愿在多大程度上取决于决策者提出的问题或决策的特征。这项研究将使用探索性混合方法设计来研究公众对参与澳大利亚HTA决策的偏好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号