首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Medical Research Methodology >Are we drawing the right conclusions from randomised placebo-controlled trials? A post-hoc analysis of data from a randomised controlled trial
【2h】

Are we drawing the right conclusions from randomised placebo-controlled trials? A post-hoc analysis of data from a randomised controlled trial

机译:我们是否从随机安慰剂对照试验中得出正确的结论?对来自随机对照试验的数据进行事后分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundAssumptions underlying placebo controlled trials include that the placebo effect impacts on all study arms equally, and that treatment effects are additional to the placebo effect. However, these assumptions have recently been challenged, and different mechanisms may potentially be operating in the placebo and treatment arms. The objective of the current study was to explore the nature of placebo versus pharmacological effects by comparing predictors of the placebo response with predictors of the treatment response in a randomised, placebo-controlled trial of a phytotherapeutic combination for the treatment of menopausal symptoms. A substantial placebo response was observed but no significant difference in efficacy between the two arms.
机译:背景安慰剂对照试验的基本假设包括,安慰剂作用对所有研究组的影响均等,并且治疗作用是安慰剂作用的补充。但是,这些假设最近受到了挑战,并且不同的机制可能在安慰剂和治疗组中发挥作用。本研究的目的是通过在一项用于治疗更年期症状的随机,安慰剂对照试验中,比较安慰剂反应的预测因子与治疗反应的预测因子,探讨安慰剂与药理作用的性质。观察到大量安慰剂反应,但两组之间的疗效无显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号