首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Proceedings >Application of collapsing methods for continuous traits to the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 exome sequence data
【2h】

Application of collapsing methods for continuous traits to the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 exome sequence data

机译:连续性状的折叠方法在遗传分析研讨会17外显子组序列数据中的应用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 used real sequence data from the 1000 Genomes Project and simulated phenotypes influenced by a large number of rare variants. Our aim is to evaluate the performance of various collapsing methods that were developed for analysis of multiple rare variants. We apply collapsing methods to continuous phenotypes Q1 and Q2 for all 200 replicates of the unrelated individuals data. Within each gene, we collapse (1) all SNPs, (2) all SNPs with minor allele frequency (MAF) < 0.05, and (3) nonsynonymous SNPs with MAF < 0.05. We consider two tests when collapsing variants: using the proportion of variants and using the presence/absence of any variant. We also compare our results to a single-marker analysis using PLINK. For phenotype Q1, the proportion test for collapsing rare nonsynonymous SNPs often performed the best. Two genes (FLT1 and KDR) had statistically significant results. A single-marker analysis using PLINK also provided statistically significant results for some SNPs within these two genes. For phenotype Q2, collapsing rare nonsynonymous SNPs performed the best, with almost no difference between proportion and presence tests. However, neither collapsing methods nor a single-marker analysis provided statistically significant results at the true genes for Q2. We also found that a large number of noncausal genes had high correlations with causal genes for Q1 and Q2, which may account for inflated false positives.
机译:遗传分析研讨会17使用来自1000个基因组计划的真实序列数据和受大量稀有变异影响的模拟表型。我们的目的是评估开发用于分析多种稀有变体的各种折叠方法的性能。对于不相关的个​​人数据的所有200个重复,我们将折叠方法应用于连续表型Q1和Q2。在每个基因内,我们折叠(1)所有SNP,(2)所有具有次要等位基因频率(MAF)<0.05的SNP,以及(3)MAF <0.05的非同义SNP。折叠变体时,我们考虑两种测试:使用变体的比例以及使用/不存在任何变体。我们还将结果与使用PLINK的单标记分析进行比较。对于表型Q1,折叠稀有的非同义SNP的比例测试通常表现最佳。两个基因(FLT1和KDR)具有统计学意义。使用PLINK的单标记分析还为这两个基因中的某些SNP提供了统计上显着的结果。对于Q2型,折叠的稀有非同义SNP表现最佳,比例测试和在位测试之间几乎没有差异。但是,无论是折叠方法还是单标记分析,都没有在Q2的真实基因上提供统计学上显着的结果。我们还发现,大量的非因果基因与Q1和Q2的因果基因高度相关,这可能解释了虚假阳性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号