首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Psychiatry >Cross-country discrepancies on public understanding of stress concepts: evidence for stress-management psychoeducational programs
【2h】

Cross-country discrepancies on public understanding of stress concepts: evidence for stress-management psychoeducational programs

机译:公众对压力概念的理解存在跨国差异:压力管理心理教育计划的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundNegative effects of stress have pose one of the major threats to the health and economic well being of individuals independently of age and cultural background. Nevertheless, the term “stress” has been globally used unlinked from scientificevidence-based meaning. The discrepancies between scientific and public stress knowledge are focus of concern and little is know about it. This is relevant since misconceptions about stress may influence the effects of stress-management psychoeducational programs and the development of best practices for interventions. The study aimed to analyze stress knowledge among the Canadian and Brazilian general public and to determine the extent to which scientific and popular views of stress differ between those countries.
机译:背景技术压力的负面影响已成为独立于年龄和文化背景的个人健康和经济福祉的主要威胁之一。然而,“压力”一词在全球范围内与基于科学证据的含义无关。科学和公共压力知识之间的差异是关注的焦点,对此了解甚少。这是有意义的,因为对压力的误解可能会影响压力管理心理教育计划的效果以及干预措施最佳实践的发展。该研究旨在分析加拿大和巴西公众之间的压力知识,并确定这些国家之间科学和大众对压力的看法有多大差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号