首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Physiology >An investigation into the relationship between age and physiological function in highly active older adults
【2h】

An investigation into the relationship between age and physiological function in highly active older adults

机译:高强度活动老年人的年龄与生理功能之间关系的调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Despite extensive research, the relationship between age and physiological function remains poorly characterised and there are currently no reliable markers of human ageing. This is probably due to a number of confounding factors, particularly in studies of a cross-sectional nature. These include inter-subject genetic variation, as well as inter-generational differences in nutrition, healthcare and insufficient levels of physical activity as well as other environmental factors. We have studied a cohort of highly and homogeneously active older male (n = 84) and female (n = 41) cyclists aged 55–79 years who it is proposed represent a model for the study of human ageing free from the majority of confounding factors, especially inactivity. The aim of the study was to identify physiological markers of ageing by assessing the relationship between function and age across a wide range of indices. Each participant underwent a detailed physiological profiling which included measures of cardiovascular, respiratory, neuromuscular, metabolic, endocrine and cognitive functions, bone strength, and health and well-being. Significant associations between age and function were observed for many functions. The maximal rate of oxygen consumption ( showed the closest association with age (r = −0.443 to −0.664; P < 0.001), but even here the variance in age for any given level was high, precluding the clear identification of the age of any individual. The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that even when many confounding variables are removed the relationship between function and healthy ageing is complex and likely to be highly individualistic and that physical activity levels must be taken into account in ageing studies.Key Points class="unordered" style="list-style-type:disc"> The relationship between age and physiological function remains poorly defined and there are no physiological markers that can be used to reliably predict the age of an individual. This could be due to a variety of confounding genetic and lifestyle factors, and in particular to ill-defined and low levels of physical activity. This study assessed the relationship between age and a diverse range of physiological functions in a cohort of highly active older individuals (cyclists) aged 55–79 years in whom the effects of lifestyle factors would be ameliorated. Significant associations between age and function were observed for many functions. was most closely associated with age, but even here the variance in age for any given level was high, precluding the clear identification of the age of any individual. The data suggest that the relationship between human ageing and physiological function is highly individualistic and modified by inactivity. class="head no_bottom_margin" id="__sec2title">IntroductionOver the past two centuries human life expectancy has more than doubled in the developed world (Oeppen & Vaupel, ), resulting in a dramatic increase in the number of older individuals. Advancing age is associated with declines in function which ultimately lead to a loss of independence accompanied by increased prevalence of age-associated diseases and frailty (Doherty, ). In many biological models of ageing, longevity is used as the primary outcome measure (Bartke et al. ; Tatar, ), but in humans this is arguably of less importance than the consequences of a deterioration in physiological function. In this regard healthy life expectancy, termed ‘the healthspan’, is not keeping pace with average life expectancy (House of Lords Science and Technology Committee, ), such that the years spent with poor health and disabilities in old age are increasing. Thus there is a drive to find strategies by which healthspan can be increased, optimal physiological function maintained and the trajectory towards frailty lowered (Kirkland & Peterson, ; Tatar, ). However, our understanding of the relationship between healthy ageing and physiological function is limited and no markers exist which can be used to estimate the age of an individual.A host of factors that are intrinsic to research on human ageing, particularly in studies with a cross-sectional design, confound our interpretation of the age–function relationship. These factors include genetic variation between participants, inter-generational lifestyle, socio-economic, nutritional, healthcare and other environmental differences, as well as variations in the criteria used for the selection of participants (Metter et al. ; Lazarus & Harridge, ). In particular, a lack of adequate physical activity is known to have serious negative effects on physiological function (Blair, ) and in cases of enforced inactivity (e.g. bed rest and micro gravity) this initiates a so-called ‘accelerated ageing’ process (Saltin et al. ; McGuire et al. ). Because the majority of the older population fail to meet the recommended guidelines for physical activity and are largely sedentary (Blair, ) the tendency is to assume that inactivity is the inevitable condition for humans (Booth & Lees, ). However, given that our genetic inheritance stems from a period when high levels of physical activity were likely to be the norm (Booth et al. ), it has been argued that being physically active should be considered the default position for maintaining health and physiological function throughout the life span (Booth & Lees, ; Lazarus & Harridge, href="#b49" rid="b49" class=" bibr popnode tag_hotlink tag_tooltip" id="__tag_426438851">2010). In this light, an age-related deterioration in function (or inferred deterioration in the case of cross-sectional studies) measured in populations of sedentary people does not reflect the biological ageing process, but should be described as being the product of the ageing process superimposed on a background of disuse.Consequently, the experimental design for the study reported here, which aimed to investigate the relationship between age and physiological function, was mandated by the following considerations. First, having decided that exercise was the default condition for optimal physiological status, all participants had to be highly physically active. Secondly, with a longer life span and closer proximity to thresholds of functional independence, particularly as a result of a lower muscle mass (Skelton et al. href="#b89" rid="b89" class=" bibr popnode tag_hotlink tag_tooltip" id="__tag_426438949">2002), the inclusion of females as well males was essential. Finally, although the indices to be measured would focus heavily on the systems critical for maintaining physical function and health in later life, particularly the cardiovascular and musculoskeletal systems, a wide range of other indices were also measured that would be indicative of good health. Therefore, a deep phenotyping of each individual was undertaken.The aim of the study was thus to determine the relationship between age and function in non-elite male and female exercisers aged 55–79 years using a wide range of physiological indices and then to determine if any given function(s) could serve as a marker(s) of ageing as defined by its ability to predict the age of a healthy individual. The overarching hypothesis of our study was that only in the physically active would the relationship between age and physiological function be reflective of the ageing process.
机译:尽管进行了广泛的研究,但年龄与生理功能之间的关系仍然不很清楚,并且目前还没有可靠的人类衰老标记。这可能是由于许多混杂因素造成的,尤其是在横截面性质的研究中。其中包括受试者间的遗传变异,以及营养,保健,世代运动水平不足以及其他环境因素之间的代际差异。我们研究了一群年龄在55-79岁之间的,活跃度较高且活跃度较高的男性(n = 84)和女性(n = 41)自行车运动员,这些自行车代表了一种不受大多数​​混杂因素影响的人类衰老研究模型,尤其是闲置状态。这项研究的目的是通过评估各种指标中功能与年龄之间的关系来识别衰老的生理标志。每个参与者都进行了详细的生理学分析,包括心血管,呼吸,神经肌肉,代谢,内分泌和认知功能,骨骼强度以及健康状况。对于许多功能,年龄与功能之间存在显着关联。最大耗氧率(显示出与年龄最密切的关联(r = -0.443至-0.664; P <0.001),但即使在此情况下,任何给定水平的年龄差异也很大,因此无法明确确定任何年龄的年龄这项横断面研究的结果表明,即使删除了许多混杂变量,功能与健康衰老之间的关系也很复杂,并且可能具有高度个体性,并且在衰老研究中必须考虑体育锻炼的水平。 class =“ unordered” style =“ list-style-type:disc”> <!-list-behavior = unordered prefix-word = mark-type = disc max-label-size = 0-> 年龄与生理功能之间的关系仍然定义不清,没有生理标记可用来可靠地预测个体的年龄。 这可能是由于多种混杂的遗传和生活方式因素所致,尤其是对身体不明确和低水平的人校准活动。 这项研究评估了年龄在55-79岁之间的一组活跃度较高的老年人(骑自行车的人)中年龄与多种生理功能之间的关系,在这些人群中,生活方式因素的影响将得到改善。 对于许多功能,年龄和功能之间存在显着关联。与年龄最密切相关,但即使在此情况下,任何给定水平的年龄差异都很大,因此无法明确识别任何人的年龄。 数据表明,人的衰老与生理功能之间的关系具有高度个体性,并且由于不活动而被改变。 class =“ head no_bottom_margin” id =“ __ sec2title”>简介在过去的两个世纪中,发达国家的人均寿命翻了一番以上(Oeppen&Vaupel,),导致老年人人数急剧增加。年龄的增长与功能的下降有关,最终导致丧失独立性,并伴随着与年龄有关的疾病和虚弱的患病率上升(Doherty,)。在许多衰老的生物学模型中,寿命被用作主要结果指标(Bartke等人;塔塔尔(Tatar)),但是在人类中,这可以说是不如生理功能恶化的后果那么重要的。在这方面,被称为“健康跨度”的健康预期寿命与平均预期寿命不符(上议院科学技术委员会,),因此,老年人因身体健康和残疾而度过的岁月正在增加。因此,有一种驱动力寻找可以增加健康期,维持最佳生理功能,降低衰弱轨迹的策略(Kirkland&Peterson,; Tatar,)。然而,我们对健康衰老与生理功能之间关系的理解是有限的,并且不存在可用于估计个体年龄的标志物。许多有关人类衰老研究的内在因素,尤其是在交叉研究中截面设计,混淆了我们对年龄-功能关系的解释。这些因素包括参与者之间的遗传变异,代际生活方式,社会经济,营养,医疗保健和其他环境差异,以及用于选择参与者的标准差异(Metter等; Lazarus&Harridge,)。尤其是,缺乏适当的体育锻炼对生理功能会产生严重的负面影响(布莱尔,),以及在强迫性不活动(例如卧床休息和微重力)的情况下,会启动所谓的“加速老化”过程(Saltin等人; McGuire等人)。因为大多数老年人不符合建议的体育锻炼准则,并且大部分都是久坐的(Blair,),所以倾向于假定不运动是人类的必然状况(Booth&Lees,)。但是,鉴于我们的遗传继承源于高水平的体育活动很可能成为常态的时期(Booth et al。),有人认为体育活动应被视为维持健康和生理功能的默认位置整个生命周期(Booth&Lees ;; Lazarus&Harridge,href="#b49" rid="b49" class=" bibr popnode tag_hotlink tag_tooltip" id="__tag_426438851"> 2010 )。因此,在久坐的人群中测得的与年龄有关的功能恶化(或在横断面研究中推断为恶化)不能反映生物衰老过程,而应描述为衰老过程的产物因此,在此报告的该研究的实验设计旨在研究年龄与生理功能之间的关系,并出于以下考虑。首先,确定运动是获得最佳生理状态的默认条件后,所有参与者都必须高度运动。其次,寿命更长,更接近功能独立性阈值,特别是由于肌肉质量降低导致的(Skelton等人。href =“#b89” rid =“ b89” class =“ bibr popnode tag_hotlink tag_tooltip “ id =” __ tag_426438949“> 2002 ),女性和男性的融合都是必不可少的。最后,尽管要测量的指标将主要集中在维持晚年生理机能和健康的关键系统上,特别是心血管和肌肉骨骼系统,但还测量了范围广泛的其他指标,这些指标表明身体健康。因此,对每个人进行了深入的表型研究。因此,本研究的目的是使用广泛的生理指标来确定年龄在55-79岁之间的非精英男女锻炼者的年龄与功能之间的关系,然后确定是否有任何给定的功能可以用作衰老的标志,如其预测健康个体年龄的能力所定义。我们研究的总体假设是,只有在体育锻炼中,年龄和生理功能之间的关系才能反映出衰老过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号