首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Public Health >Understanding burnout according to individual differences: ongoing explanatory power evaluation of two models for measuring burnout types
【2h】

Understanding burnout according to individual differences: ongoing explanatory power evaluation of two models for measuring burnout types

机译:根据个体差异了解倦怠:用于测量倦怠类型的两个模型的持续解释性功率评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe classic determination of burnout is by means of the dimensions exhaustion, cynicism and inefficacy. A new definition of the syndrome is based on clinical subtypes, consisting of “frenetic” (involved, ambitious, overloaded), “underchallenged” (indifferent, bored, with lack of personal development) and “worn-out” (neglectful, unacknowledged, with little control). The dimensions of overload, lack of development and neglect form a shortened version of this perspective. The aims of this study were to estimate and to compare the explanatory power of both typological models, short and long, with the standard measurement.
机译:背景精疲力尽的经典决定因素是疲惫,玩世不恭和无效。该综合征的新定义基于临床亚型,包括“疯狂的”(参与,雄心勃勃,超负荷),“缺乏挑战”(冷漠,无聊,缺乏个人发展)和“疲倦”(疏忽,无知,几乎无法控制)。超载,缺乏发展和忽视的维度构成了这种观点的简化形式。这项研究的目的是估计和比较两种类型的短期和长期类型学模型与标准度量方法的解释力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号