首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Public Health >Eligibility the ICF and the UN Convention: Australian perspectives
【2h】

Eligibility the ICF and the UN Convention: Australian perspectives

机译:资格ICF和联合国公约:澳大利亚的观点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, in Australia, acts as a philosophical and moral statement and framework guiding integrated and strategic policy across the nation. Broad policy agreement has been reached by governments, and both the government and non-government sectors are developing strategies for implementation or evaluation. There is however a need for a more integrated approach to disability policy and information, reflecting all three components of the Italian project:• legislation and a high level philosophical framework and policy guide;• a technical framework that can underpin specific policies and programs aiming to achieve the major goals; and ,• a language and set of tools, relating to both the above, that provide infrastructure for assessment methods and information systems.The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) is the ideal tool to support the latter two components, consistent with the UN Convention. While the ICF has been used as the basis for national data standards, in population surveys and in the national data collection on disability support services, there is considerable scope for greater use of it, including using all domains of the Activities and Participation and the Environmental Factors component for policy, information and service provision, to advance a disability-inclusive society. Information available from the income support system and from generic services could be enhanced by reference to the ICF components. It would be of significant national value in Australia, especially as a ‘continuum of care’ is desired, if consistency of concepts and information were expanded across health and social welfare sectors. It would then be possible to obtain consistent data from health, aged care, disability and community services systems about key aspects of health and functioning, building a consolidated picture of access and experience across these sectors. Without attention to all three components of the Italian project and continuing effort to meet the challenges identified in this paper, it will not be possible to determine whether the goals of Australia’s National Disability Agreement or the ambitions of the Convention are achieved.
机译:在澳大利亚,《联合国残疾人权利公约》充当着哲学和道义上的声明和框架,指导着全国范围内的综合和战略政策。政府已经达成广泛的政策协议,政府和非政府部门都在制定实施或评估策略。但是,有必要对残障政策和信息采取更综合的方法,以反映意大利项目的所有三个组成部分:•立法以及高水平的哲学框架和政策指南;•可以作为旨在支持特定政策和计划的技术框架实现主要目标;以及与上述两者相关的语言和工具集,可为评估方法和信息系统提供基础设施。国际功能,残疾与健康分类(ICF)是支持后两个要素的理想工具与联合国公约。虽然ICF已被用作国家数据标准的基础,但在人口调查和有关残疾支持服务的国家数据收集中却得到了很大的利用,包括利用活动和参与以及环境的所有领域政策,信息和服务提供的要素组成部分,以促进包括残疾人在内的社会。从收入支持系统和一般服务中获得的信息可以通过参考ICF组成部分得到增强。如果将概念和信息的一致性扩展到卫生和社会福利部门,这将在澳大利亚具有重大的国家价值,尤其是当需要“连续护理”时。这样,就有可能从卫生,老年护理,残疾和社区服务系统中获取有关卫生和功能关键方面的一致数据,从而对这些部门的获取和经验进行综合描绘。如果不关注意大利项目的所有三个组成部分,并且不遗余力地应对本文中指出的挑战,就无法确定澳大利亚的《国家残疾人协议》的目标或《公约》的目标是否实现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号