首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Surgery >Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study)
【2h】

Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study)

机译:随机对照的多中心研究比较了直肠癌患者上腹腹部手术切除后骨盆底的生物网格闭合与会阴部原发伤口闭合的比较(BIOPEX研究)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundPrimary perineal wound closure after conventional abdominoperineal resection (cAPR) for rectal cancer has been the standard of care for many years. Since the introduction of neo-adjuvant radiotherapy and the extralevator APR (eAPR), oncological outcome has been improved, but at the cost of increased rates of perineal wound healing problems and perineal hernia. This has progressively increased the use of biological meshes, although not supported by sufficient evidence. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of pelvic floor reconstruction using a biological mesh after standardized eAPR with neo-adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy compared to primary perineal wound closure.
机译:背景直肠癌常规腹部手术切除术(cAPR)后会阴部闭合伤口的治疗已成为许多年的标准治疗方法。自从引入新辅助放疗和外翻器APR(eAPR)以来,肿瘤学结局得到了改善,但会增加会阴伤口愈合问题和会阴疝的发生率。尽管没有足够的证据支持,但这逐渐增加了生物网的使用。这项研究的目的是确定与原发会阴部伤口闭合相比,在标准eAPR联合新辅助(化学)放疗后,使用生物网片重建骨盆底的有效性。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号