首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Surgery >A randomised multi-centre prospective double blind pilot-study to evaluate safety and efficacy of the non-absorbable Optilene® Mesh Elastic versus the partly absorbable Ultrapro® Mesh for incisional hernia repair
【2h】

A randomised multi-centre prospective double blind pilot-study to evaluate safety and efficacy of the non-absorbable Optilene® Mesh Elastic versus the partly absorbable Ultrapro® Mesh for incisional hernia repair

机译:一项随机多中心前瞻性双盲先导研究用于评估不可吸收的Optilene®Mesh Elastic与部分可吸收的Ultrapro®Mesh进行切口疝修补的安全性和有效性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundRandomised controlled trials with a long term follow-up (3 to 10 years) have demonstrated that mesh repair is superior to suture closure of incisional hernia with lower recurrence rates (5 to 20% versus 20 to 63%). Yet, the ideal size and material of the mesh are not defined. So far, there are few prospective studies that evaluate the influence of the mesh texture on patient's satisfaction, recurrence and complication rate. The aim of this study is to evaluate, if a non-absorbable mesh (Optilene® Mesh Elastic) will result in better health outcomes compared to a partly absorbable mesh (Ultrapro® Mesh).
机译:背景长期随访(3至10年)的随机对照试验表明,网状修复优于切开疝的缝合线,复发率较低(5%至20%对20%至63%)。但是,尚未定义理想的网格尺寸和材料。迄今为止,很少有前瞻性研究评估网状结构对患者满意度,复发率和并发症发生率的影响。这项研究的目的是评估与部分可吸收的网格(Ultrapro ®)相比,不可吸收的网格(Optilene ® Mesh Elastic)是否会带来更好的健康结果啮合)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号