首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Global Health >Bias in patient satisfaction surveys: a threat to measuring healthcare quality
【2h】

Bias in patient satisfaction surveys: a threat to measuring healthcare quality

机译:患者满意度调查中的偏见:对衡量医疗质量的威胁

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Patient satisfaction surveys are an increasingly common element of efforts to evaluate the quality of healthcare. Many patient satisfaction surveys in low/middle-income countries frame statements positively and invite patients to agree or disagree, so that positive responses may reflect either true satisfaction or bias induced by the positive framing. In an experiment with more than 2200 patients in Nigeria, we distinguish between actual satisfaction and survey biases. Patients randomly assigned to receive negatively framed statements expressed significantly lower levels of satisfaction (87%) than patients receiving the standard positively framed statements (95%—p<0.001). Depending on the question, the effect is as high as a 19 percentage point drop (p<0.001). Thus, high reported patient satisfaction likely overstates the quality of health services. Providers and policymakers wishing to gauge the quality of care will need to avoid framing that induces bias and to complement patient satisfaction measures with more objective measures of quality.
机译:患者满意度调查是评估医疗质量的越来越普遍的要素。低收入/中等收入国家/地区的许多患者满意度调查都积极地陈述了自己的观点,并邀请患者同意或不同意,因此,积极的回应可能反映出真正的满意度或由积极构架引起的偏见。在尼日利亚超过2200名患者的实验中,我们区分了实际满意度和调查偏见。随机分配接受负框架陈述的患者的满意度(87%)明显低于接受标准正框架陈述的患者(95%-p <0.001)。根据问题的不同,效果可能会下降19个百分点(p <0.001)。因此,高报的患者满意度可能夸大了医疗服务的质量。希望评估护理质量的提供者和政策制定者将需要避免造成偏见的框架,并以更客观的质量度量来补充患者满意度度量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号