首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open >Comparing provision and appropriateness of health care between immigrants and non-immigrants in Germany using the example of neuraxial anaesthesia during labour: cross-sectional study
【2h】

Comparing provision and appropriateness of health care between immigrants and non-immigrants in Germany using the example of neuraxial anaesthesia during labour: cross-sectional study

机译:以分娩时的神经麻醉为例比较德国移民和非移民之间医疗保健的提供和适当性:横断面研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

ObjectiveResearch on health services for immigrants has mostly been concerned with access barriers but rarely with appropriateness and responsiveness of care. We assessed whether appropriateness and responsiveness of care depend on migration status, using provision of neuraxial anaesthesia (NA) during labour as indicator. In relation to their migration status, we analysed whether (1) women undergoing elective or secondary/urgent secondary caesarean sections (ESCS) appropriately receive NA (instead of general anaesthesia), (2) women delivering vaginally appropriately receive NA and (3) women objecting to NA, for example, for religious reasons, may deliver vaginally without receiving NA (provider responsiveness).
机译:客观的关于移民健康服务的研究主要关注获得障碍,但很少关注护理的适当性和响应性。我们使用分娩时的神经麻醉(NA)作为指标,评估了护理的适当性和响应性是否取决于迁移状态。关于其迁移状态,我们分析了(1)接受选择性剖腹产或继发性/紧急继发剖腹产(ESCS)的妇女是否适当接受NA(代替全身麻醉),(2)阴道分娩的妇女适当接受NA和(3)妇女例如,出于宗教原因,反对NA可能会阴道分娩而没有得到NA(提供者反应)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号