首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences >TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY PERIPROSTATIC LOCAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN TOLERANCE
【2h】

TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY PERIPROSTATIC LOCAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN TOLERANCE

机译:经直肠超声引导的前列腺活检围手术期局部麻醉和疼痛耐受性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We have evaluated objectively pain tolerance in transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS) using local periprostatic per rectal anesthesia as compared to the conventional method. From November 2008 to May 2009, 90 patients underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy at Department of Urology, Clinical Center University Sarajevo. 90 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomized into 3 groups of 30 patients each. Group 1 received periprostatic local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine, group 2 received Voltaren supp placed in rectum an hour before biopsy while group 3 received no local anesthesia. Pain scale responses were analyzed for each aspect of the biopsy procedure with a visual analog scale of 0-none to 10-maximal. There was no difference between the 3 groups in pain scores during digital rectal examination, intrarectal injection and probe insertion. The mean pain scores during needle insertion in group 1 receiving periprostatic nerve block and in group 2 receiving Voltaren supp were 3,10 ± 2,32 and 5,15 ± 2,01 respectively. In group 3 (no local anesthesia), mean pain scores were 6,06 ± 2,95 which was found to be significantly different (p < 0,001). However, morbidity after the biopsy was not statistically different between all 3 groups. TRUS-guided prostate biopsy is a traumatic and painful experience, but the periprostatic blockage use is clearly associated with more tolerance and patient comfort during the exam. It is an easy, safe, acceptable and reproducible technique and should be considered for all patients undergoing TRUS biopsy regardless of age or number of biopsies.
机译:与传统方法相比,我们已经客观地评估了每直肠麻醉使用局部前列腺癌经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检(TRUS)中的疼痛耐受性。从2008年11月至2009年5月,在萨拉热窝大学临床中心泌尿外科对90例患者进行了经直肠超声引导的前列腺穿刺活检。将符合入组标准的90例患者随机分为3组,每组30例。第1组接受前列腺癌周围麻醉并使用2%利多卡因,第2组接受活检前一小时在直肠中放置Voltaren sup,而第3组未接受局部麻醉。对于活检过程的每个方面,使用0-无最大到10-最大的可视模拟量表来分析疼痛量表响应。在直肠指检,直肠内注射和探头插入过程中,三组的疼痛评分没有差异。接受前列腺周围神经阻滞的第1组和接受Voltaren支持的第2组在针插入过程中的平均疼痛评分分别为3,10±2,32和5,15±2,01。在第3组(无局部麻醉)中,平均疼痛评分为6.06±2.95,发现有显着差异(p <0,001)。但是,活检后的发病率在所有3组之间均无统计学差异。 TRUS引导的前列腺穿刺活检是一种痛苦和痛苦的经历,但是前列腺周围阻塞的使用显然与检查期间更大的耐受性和患者舒适度有关。这是一种简单,安全,可接受和可重复的技术,无论年龄或活检次数如何,所有接受TRUS活检的患者均应考虑使用该技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号