首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Physiology >Carotid baroreceptor stimulation alters cutaneous vascular conductance during whole-body heating in humans
【2h】

Carotid baroreceptor stimulation alters cutaneous vascular conductance during whole-body heating in humans

机译:颈动脉压力感受器刺激在人体全身加热过程中改变皮肤血管电导

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Prior studies investigating carotid baroreflex control of the cutaneous vasculature have yielded mixed findings. However, previously used methodological and analytical techniques may limit the ability to detect carotid baroreflex-mediated changes in cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC). The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that dynamic carotid baroreceptor stimulation (i.e. 5 s trials) using neck pressure (NP, simulated carotid hypotension) and neck suction (NS, simulated carotid hypertension) will decrease and increase CVC, respectively, during normothermic and whole-body heating conditions in resting humans. Data were obtained from nine subjects (age, 31 ± 2 year). The ratio of forearm skin blood flux (laser-Doppler flowmetry) and arterial blood pressure (Finapres) was used as an index of CVC. Multiple 5 s trials of NP (+40Torr) and NS (−60Torr), as well as breath-hold/airflow control trials, were applied during end-expiratory breath-holds while subjects were normotheric and heat stressed (change in core temperature ∼0.75°C). CVC responses to each NP and NS trial were averaged into 1 s intervals during the following periods: 3 s prestimulus, 5 s during stimulus, and 5 s poststimulus. Peak CVC responses (3 s average) to NP and NS were compared to prestimulus values using paired t test. During normothermia, NP decreased CVC by 0.032 ± 0.007 arbitrary units (a.u.) mmHg−1; (P < 0.05); however, breath-hold/airflow control trials resulted in similar decreases in CVC. NS did not change CVC (Δ = 0.002 ± 0.005 a.u. mmHg−1; P = 0.63). During whole-body heating, NP decreased CVC (by 0.16 ± 0.04 a.u. mmHg−1; (P < 0.05), whereas NS increased CVC by 0.07 ± 0.03 a.u. mmHg−1; (P < 0.05). Furthermore, these changes were greater than, or directionally different from, the breath-hold/airflow control trials. These findings indicate that carotid baroreceptor stimulation elicits dynamic changes in CVC and that these changes are more apparent during whole-body heating.
机译:先前的研究对皮肤血管的颈动脉压力反射控制进行了研究,得出的结论不一。但是,以前使用的方法和分析技术可能会限制检测颈动脉压力反射介导的皮肤血管电导(CVC)变化的能力。这项研究的目的是检验以下假设:使用颈压(NP,模拟颈动脉低血压)和颈部吸力(NS,模拟颈动脉高血压)动态颈动脉压力感受器刺激(即5 s试验)将分别降低和增加CVC正常人的正常体温和全身加热条件。数据来自九名受试者(年龄,31±2岁)。前臂皮肤血流量(激光多普勒血流仪)和动脉血压(Finapres)之比用作CVC指标。在受试者处于常温和热应激状态时,在呼气末屏气期间进行了多次5 s NP(+ 40Torr)和NS(-60Torr)试验,以及屏气/气流控制试验(核心温度变化〜 0.75°C)。在以下期间,每个NP和NS试验的CVC反应平均间隔为1 s:刺激前3 s,刺激期间5 s,刺激后5 s。使用配对t检验将对NP和NS的峰值CVC反应(平均3 s)与刺激前值进行比较。在正常体温期间,NP使CVC降低0.032±0.007任意单位(a.u.)mmHg -1 ; (P <0.05);然而,屏气/气流控制试验导致了CVC的类似下降。 NS没有改变CVC(Δ= 0.002±0.005 a.u. mmHg -1 ; P = 0.63)。在全身加热期间,NP使CVC降低(降低0.16±0.04 au mmHg -1 ;(P <0.05),而NS使CVC增加0.07±0.03 au mmHg -1 ;(P <0.05)。此外,这些变化大于屏气/气流控制试验或在方向上有所不同,这些发现表明,颈动脉压力感受器刺激引起CVC的动态变化,并且这些变化在过程中更为明显。全身加热。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号