首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Physiology >Theta burst stimulation induces after-effects on contralateral primary motor cortex excitability in humans
【2h】

Theta burst stimulation induces after-effects on contralateral primary motor cortex excitability in humans

机译:θ爆裂刺激诱发人类对侧初级运动皮层兴奋性的后效应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Interhemispheric interactions between the primary motor cortices (M1) have been described with a variety of TMS methods. Here we give a detailed description of the interhemispheric interactions of a period of theta burst simulation (TBS), a rapid method of producing long lasting after-effects on the excitability of the stimulated M1. A total of 18 right handed healthy subjects participated. In most experiments, continuous and intermittent TBS (cTBS and iTBS) were delivered over the right M1 using a coil orientated to induce antero-posterior followed by postero-anterior (AP–PA) currents in the brain. The intensity of stimulation was 80% of active motor threshold (AMT), and a total of 600 pulses were applied. The effects on the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs), short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) were evaluated in the left and right M1 before and at three different times after TBS. We also tested long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) in right M1 and interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) from right to left M1. Finally, to explore the effect of different polarities of cTBS over dominant and non-dominant hemisphere we delivered AP–PA and postero-anterior followed by antero-posterior (PA–AP) cTBS over either right or left M1 and tested MEPs in both hemispheres. In the stimulated hemisphere, cTBS reduced MEPs and SICI whereas iTBS increased MEPs and SICI. In the non-stimulated hemisphere cTBS increased MEPs and reduced SICI, while iTBS reduced MEPs and increased SICI. There were no effects on ICF, LICI or IHI. Although both AP–PA cTBS and PA–AP cTBS reduced MEPs in the stimulated M1, the former increased MEPs from non-stimulated M1 whereas the latter did not. There was no difference in the effect of cTBS on the dominant or non-dominant hemisphere.
机译:主运动皮层(M1)之间的半球间相互作用已通过多种TMS方法进行了描述。在这里,我们详细描述了theta突发模拟(TBS)周期的半球间相互作用,这是一种对受激M1的兴奋性产生持久后效的快速方法。共有18位右撇子健康受试者参加。在大多数实验中,连续的和间歇的TBS(cTBS和iTBS)通过定向在前,后诱导大脑后部(AP-PA)电流的线圈在右M1上传递。刺激强度为主动运动阈值(AMT)的80%,总共施加了600个脉冲。在TBS之前和之后的三个不同时间,评估左右M1对运动诱发电位(MEP),短时皮质内抑制(SICI)和皮质内促进(ICF)幅度的影响。我们还测试了右M1的长间隔皮质内抑制(LICI)和从右M1到左M1的半球间抑制(IHI)。最后,为了探索不同极性的cTBS对显性和非显性半球的影响,我们在左右M1上分别递送了AP–PA和后前部,然后是前后(PA–AP)cTBS,并在两个半球中测试了MEP 。在受激半球中,cTBS降低MEP和SICI,而iTBS升高MEP和SICI。在未刺激的半球中,cTBS增加MEP并降低SICI,而iTBS降低MEP并增加SICI。对ICF,LICI或IHI没有影响。尽管AP–PA cTBS和PA–AP cTBS均可降低刺激M1中的MEP,但前者会增加非刺激M1中的MEP,而后者则没有。 cTBS对优势半球或非优势半球的影响没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号