首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Cancer >Microvessel density and VEGF expression are prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. Meta-analysis of the literature
【2h】

Microvessel density and VEGF expression are prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. Meta-analysis of the literature

机译:微血管密度和VEGF表达是结直肠癌的预后因素。文献的荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We performed a meta-analysis of all published studies relating intratumoural microvessel density (MVD) (45 studies) or vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression (27 studies), both reflecting angiogenesis, to relapse free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in colorectal cancer (CRC). For each study, MVD impact was measured by risk ratio between the two survival distributions with median MVD as cutoff. Eleven studies did not mention survival data or fit inclusion criteria, six were multiple publications of same series, leaving 32 independent studies for MVD (3496 patients) and 18 for VEGF (2050 patients). Microvessel density was assessed by immunohistochemistry, using antibodies against factor VIII (16 studies), CD31 (10 studies) or CD34 (seven studies). Vascular endothelial growth factor expression was mostly assessed by immunohistochemistry. Statistics were performed for MVD in 22 studies (the others lacking survival statistics) including nine studies (n=957) for RFS and 18 for OS (n=2383) and for VEGF in 17 studies, including nine studies for RFS (n=1064) and 10 for OS (n=1301). High MVD significantly predicted poor RFS (RR=2.32 95% CI: 1.39–3.90; P<0.001) and OS (RR=1.44; 95% CI: 1.08–1.92; P=0.01). Using CD31 or CD34, MVD was inversely related to survival, whereas it was not using factor VIII. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression significantly predicted poor RFS (RR=2.84; 95% CI: 1.95–4.16) and OS (RR=1.65; 95% CI: 1.27–2.14). To strengthen our findings, future prospective studies should explore the relation between MVD or VEGF expression and survival or response to therapy (e.g. antiangiogenic therapy). Assessment of these angiogenic markers should be better standardised in future studies.
机译:我们对所有发表的有关肿瘤内微血管密度(MVD)(45个研究)或血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)表达(27个研究)的研究进行了荟萃分析,均反映了血管生成,无复发(RFS)和总体生存(OS) )在大肠癌(CRC)中。对于每项研究,MVD影响均通过两个生存分布之间的风险比来衡量,其中中位数MVD为临界值。十一项研究没有提及生存数据或符合纳入标准,六项是同一系列的多个出版物,其中有32项针对MVD的独立研究(3496例患者)和18项针对VEGF的研究(2050例)。使用抗VIII因子的抗体(16项研究),CD31(10项研究)或CD34(7项研究),通过免疫组织化学评估微血管密度。血管内皮生长因子的表达主要通过免疫组织化学评估。在22项研究中对MVD进行了统计(其他缺乏生存统计),其中包括9项RFS研究(n = 957)和18项OS(n = 2383)和VEGF的17项研究中的MVD,其中9项针对RFS的研究(n = 1064) )和OS的10(n = 1301)。高MVD显着预测RFS(RR = 2.32 95%CI:1.39–3.90; P <0.001)和OS(RR = 1.44; 95%CI:1.08-1.92; P = 0.01)较差。使用CD31或CD34,MVD与生存成反比,而未使用因子VIII。血管内皮生长因子的表达可显着预测RFS(RR = 2.84; 95%CI:1.95–4.16)和OS(RR = 1.65; 95%CI:1.27–2.14)较差。为了加强我们的发现,未来的前瞻性研究应探讨MVD或VEGF表达与生存或对治疗(例如抗血管生成治疗)的反应之间的关系。这些血管生成标记的评估应在未来的研究中更好地标准化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号