首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of Ophthalmology >Cost effectiveness of photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for age related macular degeneration: the UK case
【2h】

Cost effectiveness of photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for age related macular degeneration: the UK case

机译:Verteporfin进行光动力疗法治疗年龄相关性黄斑变性的成本效益:英国案例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Aim: To estimate the potential cost effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin in the UK setting.>Methods: Using data from a variety of sources a Markov model was built to produce estimates of the cost effectiveness (incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) and incremental cost per vision year gained) of PDT for two cohorts of patients (one with starting visual acuity (VA) of 20/40 and one at 20/100) with predominantly classic choroidal neovascular disease over a 2 year and 5 year time horizon. A government perspective and a treatment cost only perspective were considered. Probabilistic and one way sensitivity analyses were undertaken.>Results: From the government perspective, over the 2 year period, the expected incremental cost effectiveness ratios range from £286 000 (starting VA 20/100) to £76 000 (starting VA 20/40) per QALY gained and from £14 000 (20/100) to £34 000 (20/40) per vision year gained. A 5 year perspective yields incremental ratios less than £5000 for vision years gained and from £9000 (20/40) to £30 000 (20/100) for QALYs gained. Without societal or NHS cost offsets included, the 2 year incremental cost per vision year gained ranges from £20 000 (20/100) to £40 000 (20/40), and the 2 year incremental cost per QALY gained ranges from £412 000 (20/100) to £90 000 (20/40). The 5 year time frame shows expected costs of £7000 (20/40) to £10 000 (20/100) per vision year gained and from £38 000 (20/40) to £69 000 (20/100) per QALY gained.>Conclusion: This evaluation suggests that early treatment (that is, treating eyes at less severe stages of disease) with PDT leads to increased efficiency. When considering only the cost of therapy, treating people at lower levels of visual acuity would probably not be considered cost effective. However, a broad perspective that incorporates other NHS treatment costs and social care costs suggests that over a long period of time, PDT may yield reasonable value for money.
机译:>目标::要评估在英国环境中使用维替泊芬进行光动力疗法(PDT)的潜在成本效益。>方法:使用来自各种来源的数据,建立了马尔可夫模型来对两组患者(一个患者的初始视力(VA)为20/40,另一个患者的初始视力为20/40)进行PDT的成本效益评估(每质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本和获得的每视年的增量成本)的估算值100)在2年和5年的时间段内主要患有典型的脉络膜新生血管疾病。考虑了政府角度和仅治疗费用角度。 >结果:从政府的角度来看,在两年的时间里,预期的增量成本效益比范围从28.6万英镑(VA 20/100起)到76英镑。每个QALY获得000(从VA 20/40开始),从每个视觉年获得的£14 000(20/100)增加到£34 000(20/40)。 5年的透视图所获得的视野年的增量比率小于5000英镑,而获得的QALY则从9000英镑(20/40)到30,000英镑(20/100)。不包括社会或NHS成本补偿,每视力年度获得的2年增量成本从20000英镑(20/100)到40000英镑(20/40),每QALY获得的2年增量成本从412英镑不等000(20/100)至£90 000(20/40)。 5年时间框架显示,每个视力年度的预期成本为7000(20/40)至10000(20/100)英镑,每个QALY从38 000(20/40)至69 000(20/100)英镑>结论:该评估表明,PDT的早期治疗(即在疾病较轻的阶段治疗眼睛)可提高治疗效率。仅考虑治疗费用时,以较低的视敏度治疗人可能不会被认为具有成本效益。但是,将其他NHS治疗成本和社会护理成本结合在一起的广泛观点表明,PDT在很长的一段时间内可能会产生合理的物有所值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号