首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of Ophthalmology >Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporin A in high risk keratoplasty patients: a prospectively randomised clinical trial
【2h】

Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporin A in high risk keratoplasty patients: a prospectively randomised clinical trial

机译:霉酚酸酯与环孢菌素A在高危角膜移植患者中的前瞻性随机临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND/AIMS—The requirement for an effective, minimally toxic immunosuppressive agent remains a major obstacle to performing high risk corneal transplantation. Although therapy with cyclosporin A (CSA) allows superior graft survival, its use is limited because of a wide range of side effects. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been shown to be a safe and effective immunosuppressive agent following renal transplantation. This prospective, randomised clinical trial was carried out to investigate the efficacy and safety of MMF in preventing corneal allograft rejection.
METHODS—Recipients of corneal transplants who were at high risk for graft failure were randomly assigned to either CSA or MMF immunosuppressive therapy. CSA was given in doses to achieve whole blood trough levels of 120-150 ng/ml. MMF was given in a daily dose of 2 g. Both therapy groups additionally received oral corticosteroids (fluocortolone 1 mg/kg) which were tapered and discontinued within the first 3 postoperative weeks. Patients were monitored closely for evidence of corneal graft rejection and adverse side effects. Drug efficacy was measured, primarily, by the number of patients who experienced at least one episode of clinical graft rejection. Safety analysis focused on reported adverse side effects and laboratory measurements.
RESULTS—41 patients were enrolled in the study. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. 20 patients received CSA and 21 patients received MMF. Two patients in each group showed evidence of acute graft rejection which could be treated effectively by corticosteroids. All corneal grafts remained clear throughout the follow up.
CONCLUSIONS—In this study it was shown that MMF is just as effective as CSA in preventing acute rejection following high risk corneal transplantation. Mycophenolate mofetil represents a promising alternative therapeutic option in patients who are at high risk for corneal graft failure.

机译:背景/目的-对有效的,最低毒性的免疫抑制剂的需求仍然是进行高风险角膜移植的主要障碍。尽管使用环孢菌素A(CSA)进行治疗可提高移植物的存活率,但由于副作用广泛,其使用受到了限制。麦考酚酸酯(MMF)已被证明是肾移植后安全有效的免疫抑制剂。这项前瞻性随机临床试验旨在研究MMF预防同种异体角膜移植排斥反应的有效性和安全性。
方法-高移植失败风险的角膜移植受者被随机分配为CSA或MMF免疫抑制剂治疗。给予CSA的剂量可达到120-150 ng / ml的全血谷水平。 MMF的每日剂量为2 g。两个治疗组均另外接受了口服皮质类固醇激素(氟可孕酮1 mg / kg),它们在术后3周内逐渐缩小并停用。密切监测患者的角膜移植排斥反应和不良副作用的证据。药物功效主要通过经历至少一次临床移植排斥反应的患者人数来衡量。安全性分析的重点是已报道的不良副作用和实验室测量结果。
结果-该研究纳入了41名患者。两组之间无统计学差异。 20名患者接受了CSA,21名患者接受了MMF。每组中有两名患者显示出移植物急性排斥反应的证据,可以通过皮质类固醇激素有效治疗。在整个随访过程中,所有角膜移植物均保持清晰。
结论—在这项研究中,MMF在预防高风险角膜移植术后急性排斥反应方面与CSA一样有效。霉酚酸酯是高风险角膜移植失败患者的有前途的替代治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号