首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Brain Sciences >Reasoning on Figurative Language: A Preliminary Study on Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Klinefelter Syndrome
【2h】

Reasoning on Figurative Language: A Preliminary Study on Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Klinefelter Syndrome

机译:比喻性语言的推理:对自闭症谱系障碍和克莱氏综合征儿童的初步研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this study we explored metaphor and idiom competencies in two clinical populations, children with autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) and children with Klinefelter syndrome (KS), (age range: 9–12), compared to typically developing (TD) children of the same age. These three groups were tested with two multiple-choice tests assessing idiom comprehension through iconic and verbal alternatives and a metaphor comprehension test composed of novel, physical-psychological metaphors, requesting verbal explanations. To these instruments, another test was added, assessing basic sentence comprehension. Performances on the different linguistic tasks were examined by means of discriminant analysis which showed that idiom comprehension had a very small weight in distinguishing children with ASD from TD controls, whereas metaphor explanation did distinguish them. This study suggests that figurative language comprehension is not a “core deficit” per se in individuals with ASD. Only when the task requires to explicitly construct and explain a semantic mapping between the two terms of a metaphor does the performance of children with ASD significantly deviate from the typical population. These results are interpreted in terms of a difficulty in children with ASD and KS with complex cognitive and linguistic processes and also in relation with clinical assessment.
机译:在这项研究中,我们探讨了两个临床人群中的自闭症和成语能力,即自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童和Klinefelter综合征(KS)儿童(年龄范围:9至12岁),与典型的发育中(TD)儿童相比。同龄。对这三组学生进行了两项选择题测试,即通过标志性和口头选择来评估对成语的理解,以及由新颖的生理心理学隐喻组成的隐喻理解测试,要求进行口头解释。在这些工具中,添加了另一项测试,以评估基本的句子理解能力。通过判别分析检查了在不同语言任务上的表现,该分析表明,习惯用法理解在区分ASD儿童和TD对照儿童方面的权重很小,而隐喻解释确实将它们区别开来。这项研究表明,比喻性语言理解本身并不是ASD患者的“核心缺陷”。只有当任务需要明确地构造和解释隐喻的两个术语之间的语义映射时,患有ASD的儿童的表现才明显偏离典型人群。这些结果是根据患有复杂的认知和语言过程的ASD和KS儿童的困难以及与临床评估的关系来解释的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号