首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research >Randomized controlled trials of serotonin-norepinephrine reuptakeinhibitor in treating major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: ameta-analysis of efficacy and acceptability
【2h】

Randomized controlled trials of serotonin-norepinephrine reuptakeinhibitor in treating major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: ameta-analysis of efficacy and acceptability

机译:血清素去甲肾上腺素再摄取的随机对照试验抑制剂治疗儿童和青少年的重大抑郁症:疗效和可接受性的荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

New generation antidepressant therapies, including serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRIs), were introduced in the late 1980s; however, few comprehensive studies have compared the benefits and risks of various contemporary treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD) in young patients. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases was conducted from 1970 to January 2015. Only clinical trials that randomly assigned one SNRI or placebo to patients aged 7 to 18 years who met the diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder were included. Treatment success, dropout rate, and suicidal ideation/attempt outcomes were measured. Primary efficacy was determined by pooling the risk ratios (RRs) of treatment response and remission. Acceptability was determined by pooling the RRs of dropouts for all reasons and for adverse effects as well as suicide-risk outcomes. Five trials with a total of 973 patients were included. SNRIs were not significantly more effective than placebo for treatment response but were for remission. The comparison of patients taking SNRIs that dropped out for all reasons and those taking placebo did not reach statistical significance. Significantly more patients taking SNRIs dropped out for adverse effects than those taking placebo. No significant difference was found in suicide-related risk outcomes.SNRI therapy does not display a superior efficacy and is not better toleratedcompared to placebo in these young patients. However, duloxetine has a potentialbeneficial effect for depression in young populations, showing a need for furtherresearch.
机译:1980年代末期推出了新一代抗抑郁疗法,包括5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)。然而,很少有综合研究比较现代治疗对年轻患者的重大抑郁症(MDD)的益处和风险。从1970年到2015年1月,对PubMed,Cochrane,Embase,Web of Science和PsycINFO数据库进行了全面的文献检索。仅临床试验对符合主要诊断标准的7至18岁患者随机分配一个SNRI或安慰剂。包括抑郁症。测量治疗成功率,辍学率和自杀意念/尝试结果。通过合并治疗反应和缓解的风险比(RR)来确定主要疗效。可接受性是通过综合考虑各种原因,不良反应以及自杀风险结果的辍学率来确定的。纳入了总共973名患者的五项试验。对于治疗反应,SNRI并未比安慰剂有效得多,但对于缓解而言。由于各种原因服用SNRI的患者与服用安慰剂的患者的比较没有统计学意义。与服用安慰剂的患者相比,服用SNRI的患者因不良反应而辍学的比例明显更高。自杀相关风险结局无明显差异。SNRI治疗并未显示出优异的疗效,且耐受性较差与这些年轻患者的安慰剂相比。但是,度洛西汀有潜力对青年人群抑郁症的有益作用,表明需要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号