首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Bulletin of the World Health Organization >Efficacy of standard glucose-based and reduced-osmolarity maltodextrin-based oral rehydration solutions: effect of sugar malabsorption.
【2h】

Efficacy of standard glucose-based and reduced-osmolarity maltodextrin-based oral rehydration solutions: effect of sugar malabsorption.

机译:标准葡萄糖基和低渗麦芽糊精基口服补液的功效:糖吸收不良的影响。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Previously we reported that standard oral rehydration salts (ORS) solution is not as effective as a reduced-osmolarity glucose-based ORS for the treatment of children with acute noncholera diarrhoea: with standard ORS the diarrhoea lasts longer, stool output is greater, serum sodium is higher, and there is more need for supplemental intravenous infusion. We studied a reduced-osmolarity maltodextrin (MD)-based ORS to determine whether it had similar benefits, and also the effect of sugar malabsorption on the efficacy of standard and MD-based ORS. A total of 90 boys aged 3-24 months with acute noncholera diarrhoea and moderate dehydration were randomly assigned to either standard ORS (glucose 20 g/l, osmolarity 311 mmol/l) or MD-ORS (MD 50 g/l, osmolarity 227 mmol/l). There were no differences in treatment results. Some 46% of subjects had a high total stool output (> 300 g/kg), which was unrelated to the type of ORS given. High stool output was significantly associated with a longer duration of diarrhoea (33 vs. 15 hours; P < 0.001), a persistently elevated serum sodium (149 vs. 144 mmol/l at 24 h; P < 0.02), the need for intravenous infusion (11/41 vs. 0/48; P < 0.002), and an increase in faecal reducing substances (10.8 vs. 3.4 g/l at 24 h; P < 0.001). We conclude that some children given standard ORS develop osmotic diarrhoea owing to the combined effect of transient sugar malabsorption and slight hypertonicity of the ORS. Earlier studies show that this adverse outcome can largely be avoided when extra water is given in reduced-osmolarity glucose-based ORS. Reduced osmolarity has no benefit, however, when glucose is replaced by maltodextrin, probably because the sugars released by hydrolysis of MD, when malabsorbed, raise the intraluminal osmolarity to equal or exceed that of standard ORS. Thus, reduced-osmolarity glucose-based ORS is superior to both standard ORS and reduced-osmolarity solutions based on maltodextrin and probably other complex carbohydrates. Studies are in progress to define the optimal formulation of reduced-osmolarity glucose-based ORS.
机译:先前我们曾报道标准口服补液盐(ORS)溶液不如降渗透性葡萄糖基ORS来治疗儿童急性非霍乱腹泻的效果好:使用标准ORS的腹泻持续时间更长,大便排出量更大,血清钠更高,并且更多需要补充静脉输液。我们研究了基于降低渗透压的麦芽糖糊精(MD)的ORS,以确定其是否具有相似的益处,以及糖​​吸收不良对标准和基于MD的ORS功效的影响。随机将90名年龄在3-24个月的急性非霍乱腹泻和中度脱水的男孩随机分配到标准ORS(葡萄糖20 g / l,渗透压311 mmol / l)或MD-ORS(MD 50 g / l,渗透压227)中mmol / l)。治疗结果无差异。约46%的受试者大便总产量较高(> 300 g / kg),这与所给予的ORS类型无关。大便量高与腹泻时间更长(33 vs. 15小时; P <0.001),血清钠持续升高(24 h 149 vs. 144 mmol / l; P <0.02)有关,需要静脉注射输液(11/41 vs.0 / 48; P <0.002),以及减少粪便的物质增加(24小时时为10.8 vs. 3.4 g / l; P <0.001)。我们得出的结论是,由于瞬时糖吸收不良和ORS的轻微高渗的综合作用,一些接受标准ORS的儿童会发生渗透性腹泻。较早的研究表明,当在渗透压降低的葡萄糖基ORS中补充水分时,可以很大程度上避免这种不良后果。但是,当用麦芽糖糊精代替葡萄糖时,渗透压降低没有益处,这可能是因为MD水解释放的糖吸收不良后,使管腔内渗透压升高至等于或超过标准ORS。因此,基于克分子渗透压降低的摩尔浓度的ORS优于标准ORS和基于麦芽糖糊精和其他复杂碳水化合物的克分子渗透压降低的溶液。正在进行研究以确定降低渗透压的葡萄糖基ORS的最佳配方。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号