首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Bulletin of the World Health Organization >Twenty-four-hour recall knowledge-attitude-practice questionnaires and direct observations of sanitary practices: a comparative study
【2h】

Twenty-four-hour recall knowledge-attitude-practice questionnaires and direct observations of sanitary practices: a comparative study

机译:24小时召回知识态度实践调查表和卫生实践的直接观察:一项比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although responses to 24-hour recall and knowledge—attitude—practice questionnaires are commonly used in water—sanitation studies as surrogates for direct observation of behaviour, the validity of this approach is questionable. We therefore compared questionnaire data with those obtained by direct observation of practices related to water storage, handwashing, and defecation among 247 families in urban Dhaka, Bangladesh. Analysis of the results indicates that accord between the replies to the questionnaires and the data collected by direct observation was poor and that the responses to the two questionnaires were often contradictory. Significant disagreements between the results of questionnaires and observations arose usually because desirable practices were over-reported by the respondents. The results of the study suggest that in urban Bangladesh 24-hour recall and knowledge—attitude—practice questionnaires should not be used as proxies for direct observation of hygiene practices.
机译:尽管对24小时召回和知识-态度-行为问卷的答复通常用于水-卫生研究中,作为直接观察行为的替代方法,但这种方法的有效性值得怀疑。因此,我们将问卷调查的数据与通过直接观察孟加拉国达卡市247个家庭的储水,洗手和排便习惯获得的数据进行了比较。对结果的分析表明,对调查表的答复与直接观察收集的数据之间的一致性差,并且对两份调查表的答复常常矛盾。问卷调查结果和观察结果之间存在重大分歧,通常是因为受访者过度报告了理想做法。研究结果表明,在孟加拉国城市地区,不应将24小时召回和知识-态度-实践调查表用作直接观察卫生习惯的代理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号