首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Canadian Journal of Surgery >Propofol administration by endoscopists versus anesthesiologists in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient safety outcomes

【2h】

Propofol administration by endoscopists versus anesthesiologists in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient safety outcomes

机译：内镜医师与麻醉医师在胃肠道内窥镜检查中使用异丙酚的系统评价和对患者安全性结局的荟萃分析

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

BackgroundWith a growing demand for endoscopic services, the role of anesthesiologists in endoscopy units must be reassessed. The aim of this study was to compare patient outcomes in non–anesthesiologist-administered propofol (NAAP) versus anesthesiologist-administered propofol (AAP) during routine endoscopy.

机译：背景技术随着对内窥镜服务需求的增长，必须重新评估麻醉师在内窥镜检查单元中的作用。这项研究的目的是比较常规内窥镜检查中非麻醉医师使用异丙酚（NAAP）与麻醉医师使用异丙酚（AAP）的患者预后。

著录项

期刊名称 Canadian Journal of Surgery
作者
Julian F. Daza; Carolyn M. Tan; Ryan J. Fielding; Allison Brown; Forough Farrokhyar; Ilun Yang;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年(卷),期 2018(61),4
年度 2018
页码 226–236
总页数 11
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类外科学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Propofol administration by endoscopists versus anesthesiologists in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient safety outcomes [J] . Daza Julian F., Tan Carolyn M., Fielding Ryan J., Canadian journal of surgery: Journal canadien de chirurgie . 2018,第4期

机译：异丙酚给药的内窥镜师与胃肠内窥镜检查中的麻醉药物：患者安全结果的系统评价和荟萃分析
2. Response to: Propofol administration by endoscopists versus anesthesiologists in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient safety outcomes [J] . Robert Byrick, Dennis Pitt Canadian journal of surgery: Journal canadien de chirurgie . 2018,第5期

机译：反应对：胃肠内窥镜检查的内窥镜检查者对丙糊精与麻醉药物的影响：患者安全结果的系统审查和荟萃分析
3. Author response: Response to: Propofol administration by endoscopists versus anesthesiologists in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient safety outcomes [J] . Julian F. Daza, Carolyn M. Tan, Ilun Yang Canadian journal of surgery: Journal canadien de chirurgie . 2018,第5期

机译：作者响应：响应：反对内窥镜师的异丙酚给药与胃肠内镜内窥镜检查的麻醉学家：患者安全结果的系统评价和荟萃分析
4. Exposure to Formaldehyde and Effects on Asthma Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [C] . Juleen Lam, Erica Koustas, Patrice Sutton, Joint annual meeting of the International Society of Exposure Science and the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology . 2018

机译：甲醛暴露及其对哮喘结果的影响：系统评价和荟萃分析
5. Mycophenolic acid versus azathioprine in primary immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients - Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. [D] . Wagner, Martin. 2009

机译：麦考酚酸与硫唑嘌呤在肾移植受者初次免疫抑制中的作用-系统评价，荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
6. Response to: Propofol administration by endoscopists versus anesthesiologists in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient safety outcomes [O] . Robert Byrick, Dennis Pitt 2018

机译：回应：内镜医师与麻醉医师在胃肠道内窥镜检查中使用异丙酚：对患者安全性结果的系统评价和荟萃分析
7. Propofol versus midazolam for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in cirrhotic patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. [O] . Hsiao-Chien Tsai, Yu-Cih Lin, Ching-Lung Ko, 2015

机译：异丙酚与咪达唑仑用于肝硬化患者的上消化道内镜检查：随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Propofol administration by endoscopists versus anesthesiologists in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient safety outcomes

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅