首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancers >Mastectomy or Breast-Conserving Therapy for Early Breast Cancer in Real-Life Clinical Practice: Outcome Comparison of 7565 Cases
【2h】

Mastectomy or Breast-Conserving Therapy for Early Breast Cancer in Real-Life Clinical Practice: Outcome Comparison of 7565 Cases

机译:在现实生活中乳房切除术或早期乳腺癌的保乳疗法在临床实践中的效果比较:7556例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although the organ preservation strategy by breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiation therapy (BCT) has revolutionized the treatment approach of early stage breast cancer (BC), the choice between treatment options in this setting can still vary according to patient preferences. The aim of the present study was to compare the oncological outcome of mastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy in patients treated in a modern clinical setting outside of clinical trials. 7565 women diagnosed with early invasive BC (pT1/2pN0/1) between 1998 and 2014 were included in this study (median follow-up: 95.2 months). In order to reduce selection bias and confounding, a subgroup analysis of a matched 1:1 case-control cohort consisting of 1802 patients was performed (median follow-up 109.4 months). After adjusting for age, tumor characteristics and therapies, multivariable analysis for local recurrence-free survival identified BCT as an independent predictor for improved local control (hazard ratio [HR]:1.517; 95%confidence interval:1.092–2.108, p = 0.013) as compared to mastectomy alone in the matched cohort. Ten-year cumulative incidence (CI) of lymph node recurrences was 2.0% following BCT, compared to 5.8% in patients receiving mastectomy (p < 0.001). Similarly, 10-year distant-metastasis-free survival (89.4% vs. 85.5%, p = 0.013) was impaired in patients undergoing mastectomy alone. This translated into improved survival in patients treated with BCT (10-year overall survival (OS) estimates 85.3% vs. 79.3%, p < 0.001), which was also significant on multivariable analysis (p = 0.011). In conclusion, the present study showed that patients treated with BCS followed by radiotherapy had an improved outcome compared to radical mastectomy alone. Specifically, local control, distant control, and overall survival were significantly better using the conservative approach. Thus, as a result of the present study, physicians should encourage patients to receive BCS with radiotherapy rather than mastectomy, whenever it is medically feasible and appropriate.
机译:尽管通过保乳手术(BCS)和放射疗法(BCT)进行的器官保存策略彻底改变了早期乳腺癌(BC)的治疗方法,但在这种情况下,不同治疗方案之间的选择仍然可以根据患者的喜好而有所不同。本研究的目的是比较在临床试验以外的现代临床环境中治疗的患者,乳房切除术与保乳治疗的肿瘤学结果。该研究纳入了1998年至2014年间诊断为早期浸润性BC(pT1 / 2pN0 / 1)的7565名妇女(中位随访时间:95.2个月)。为了减少选择偏见和混淆,对由1802名患者组成的1:1病例对照队列进行了亚组分析(中位随访时间为109.4个月)。调整年龄,肿瘤特征和治疗方法后,局部无复发生存的多变量分析确定BCT是改善局部控制的独立预测因子(危险比[HR]:1.517; 95%置信区间:1.092–2.108,p = 0.013)与匹配队列中单独进行乳房切除术相比。 BCT后十年淋巴结复发的十年累积发生率(CI)为2.0%,而接受乳房切除术的患者则为5.8%(p <0.001)。同样,仅接受乳房切除术的患者的10年无远处转移生存率(89.4%比85.5%,p = 0.013)受损。这转化为接受BCT治疗的患者的生存改善(10年总生存(OS)估计为85.3%,而79.3%,p <0.001),在多变量分析中也很显着(p = 0.011)。总之,本研究表明,与单纯根治性乳腺切除术相比,接受BCS放射治疗的患者的转归有所改善。具体而言,使用保守方法可以显着改善局部控制,远距离控制和总体生存率。因此,作为本研究的结果,只要医学上可行且适当,医生应鼓励患者接受放疗而不是乳腺切除术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号