首页> 外文OA文献 >Mastectomy or Breast-Conserving Therapy for Early Breast Cancer in Real-Life Clinical Practice: Outcome Comparison of 7565 Cases
【2h】

Mastectomy or Breast-Conserving Therapy for Early Breast Cancer in Real-Life Clinical Practice: Outcome Comparison of 7565 Cases

机译:现实临床实践中早期乳腺癌的乳房切除术或哺乳治疗:7565例的结果比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although the organ preservation strategy by breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiation therapy (BCT) has revolutionized the treatment approach of early stage breast cancer (BC), the choice between treatment options in this setting can still vary according to patient preferences. The aim of the present study was to compare the oncological outcome of mastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy in patients treated in a modern clinical setting outside of clinical trials. 7565 women diagnosed with early invasive BC (pT1/2pN0/1) between 1998 and 2014 were included in this study (median follow-up: 95.2 months). In order to reduce selection bias and confounding, a subgroup analysis of a matched 1:1 case-control cohort consisting of 1802 patients was performed (median follow-up 109.4 months). After adjusting for age, tumor characteristics and therapies, multivariable analysis for local recurrence-free survival identified BCT as an independent predictor for improved local control (hazard ratio [HR]:1.517; 95%confidence interval:1.092⁻2.108, p = 0.013) as compared to mastectomy alone in the matched cohort. Ten-year cumulative incidence (CI) of lymph node recurrences was 2.0% following BCT, compared to 5.8% in patients receiving mastectomy (p < 0.001). Similarly, 10-year distant-metastasis-free survival (89.4% vs. 85.5%, p = 0.013) was impaired in patients undergoing mastectomy alone. This translated into improved survival in patients treated with BCT (10-year overall survival (OS) estimates 85.3% vs. 79.3%, p < 0.001), which was also significant on multivariable analysis (p = 0.011). In conclusion, the present study showed that patients treated with BCS followed by radiotherapy had an improved outcome compared to radical mastectomy alone. Specifically, local control, distant control, and overall survival were significantly better using the conservative approach. Thus, as a result of the present study, physicians should encourage patients to receive BCS with radiotherapy rather than mastectomy, whenever it is medically feasible and appropriate.
机译:尽管器官保存策略通过哺乳母细胞保护术(BCS),其次是放射治疗(BCT)已经彻底改变了早期乳腺癌(BC)的治疗方法,但在该环境中的治疗方案之间的选择仍然可以根据患者偏好而变化。本研究的目的是比较患者在临床试验之外的现代临床环境中治疗的患者中乳房切除术与哺乳治疗的肿瘤治疗。在本研究中纳入了1998年至2014年期间患有早期侵入性BC(PT1 / 2PN0 / 1)的7565名妇女(中位随访:95.2个月)。为了减少选择偏见和混淆,对1802名患者组成的匹配的1:1个病例对照组成的亚组分析(中位随访109.4个月)。调整年龄,肿瘤特征和疗法后,将局部复发存活的多变量分析鉴定为局部预测因子,以改善局部控制(危险比[HR]:1.517; 95%置信区间:1.0922.108,P = 0.013)与单独的乳房切除术相比,在匹配的队列中。在BCT后,淋巴结复发的十年累积发病率(CI)为2.0%,而接受乳房切除术的患者(P <0.001)相比为5.8%。同样,在接受乳房切除术的患者单独患有10年的远离转移的生存期(89.4%,P = 0.013)受到损害。这在对BCT治疗的患者中转化为改善的存活(10年总存活(OS)估计85.3%与79.3%,P <0.001),这对多变量分析也显着(P = 0.011)。总之,本研究表明,与单独的自由基乳房切除术相比,用BCS治疗的患者随后对放射疗法进行了改善的结果。具体而言,使用保守方法,局部控制,远远距离控制和整体存活率明显更好。因此,由于目前的研究,医生应该鼓励患者接受放射治疗而不是乳房切除术,而不是乳房切除术,每当在医学上可行和适当的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号