首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancers >Immune Checkpoint Ligand Reverse Signaling: Looking Back to Go Forward in Cancer Therapy
【2h】

Immune Checkpoint Ligand Reverse Signaling: Looking Back to Go Forward in Cancer Therapy

机译:免疫检查点配体反向信号:回望癌症治疗的发展

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The so-called immune checkpoints are pathways that regulate the timing and intensity of the immune response to avoid an excessive reaction and to protect the host from autoimmunity. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are designed to target the negative regulatory pathways of T cells, and they have been shown to restore anti-tumor immune functions and achieve considerable clinical results. Indeed, several clinical trials have reported durable clinical response in different tumor types, such as melanoma, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nonetheless, after the initial enthusiasm, it is now evident that the majority of patients do not benefit from ICIs, due to innate or acquired tumor resistance. It is therefore mandatory to find ways to identify those patients who will respond and to find ways to induce response in those who at present do not benefit from ICIs. In this regard, the expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) on neoplastic cells was the first, and most obvious, biomarker exploited to predict the activity of anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) and/or anti-PD-L1 antibodies. As expected, a correlation was confirmed between the levels of PD-L1 and the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy in melanoma, NSCLC and RCC. However, further results from clinical trials showed that some patients display a clinical response regardless of tumor cell PD-L1 expression levels, while others do not benefit from ICI treatment despite the expression of PD-L1 on neoplastic elements. These findings strongly support the notion that other factors may be relevant for the efficacy of ICI-based treatment regimens. Furthermore, although the current dogma indicates that the PD-1/PD-L1 axis exerts its regulatory effects via the signal transduced in PD-1-expressing T cells, recent evidence suggests that a reverse signaling may also exist downstream of PD-L1 in both tumor and immune cells. The reverse signaling of PD-L1, but also of other immune checkpoints, might contribute to the pro-tumoral/immune suppressive environment associated with tumor development and progression. Clarifying this aspect could facilitate the prediction of patients’ clinical outcomes, which are so far unpredictable and result in response, resistance or even hyper-progressive disease in some cases.
机译:所谓的免疫检查点是调节免疫反应的时机和强度以避免过度反应并保护宿主免于自身免疫的途径。免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)旨在靶向T细胞的负调控途径,并且已被证明可以恢复抗肿瘤免疫功能并取得可观的临床效果。确实,一些临床试验已经报告了在不同类型肿瘤(例如黑素瘤,肾细胞癌(RCC)和非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC))中的持久临床反应。但是,在最初的热情之后,现在很明显,由于固有的或获得性的肿瘤抵抗力,大多数患者不能从ICI中获益。因此,必须找到一种方法来识别那些会做出反应的患者,并找到一种方法来诱导目前尚不受益于ICI的患者。在这方面,程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)在赘生性细胞上的表达是第一个,也是最明显的生物标志物,可用于预测抗程序性死亡1(PD-1)和/或抗PD的活性-L1抗体。如预期的那样,在黑色素瘤,NSCLC和RCC中,PD-L1的水平与抗PD-1治疗的疗效之间存在相关性。然而,临床试验的进一步结果表明,无论肿瘤细胞PD-L1的表达水平如何,一些患者均表现出临床反应,而其他患者尽管在肿瘤性分子上表达了PD-L1,但并未从ICI治疗中受益。这些发现强烈支持其他因素可能与基于ICI的治疗方案的功效有关的观点。此外,尽管目前的教条表明PD-1 / PD-L1轴是通过在表达PD-1的T细胞中转导的信号发挥其调节作用的,但最近的证据表明,反向信号可能也存在于PD-L1的下游。肿瘤细胞和免疫细胞。 PD-L1的反向信号传导以及其他免疫检查点的反向信号传导可能会促进与肿瘤发展和进展相关的促肿瘤/免疫抑制环境。澄清这一方面可以促进对患者临床结局的预测,到目前为止,这是无法预测的,并且在某些情况下会导致反应,抵抗力甚至过度疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号