首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancer Management and Research >Cost-effectiveness of adding rituximab to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Ukraine
【2h】

Cost-effectiveness of adding rituximab to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Ukraine

机译:在氟达拉滨和环磷酰胺中添加利妥昔单抗治疗乌克兰慢性淋巴细胞白血病的成本效益

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness, from a health care perspective, of adding rituximab to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide scheme (FCR versus FC) for treatment-naïve and refractory/relapsed Ukrainian patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. A decision-analytic Markov cohort model with three health states and 1-month cycle time was developed and run within a life time horizon. Data from two multinational, prospective, open-label Phase 3 studies were used to assess patients’ survival. While utilities were generalized from UK data, local resource utilization and disease-associated treatment, hospitalization, and side effect costs were applied. The alternative scenario was performed to assess the impact of lower life expectancy of the general population in Ukraine on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for treatment-naïve patients. One-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. The ICER (in US dollars) of treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients with FCR versus FC is US$8,704 per quality-adjusted life year gained for treatment-naïve patients and US$11,056 for refractory/relapsed patients. When survival data were modified to the lower life expectancy of the general population in Ukraine, the ICER for treatment-naïve patients was higher than US$13,000. This value is higher than three times the current gross domestic product per capita in Ukraine. Sensitivity analyses have shown a high impact of rituximab costs and a moderate impact of differences in utilities on the ICER. Furthermore, probabilistic sensitivity analyses have shown that for refractory/relapsed patients the probability of FCR being cost-effective is higher than for treatment-naïve patients and is close to one if the threshold is higher than US$15,000. State coverage of rituximab treatment may be considered a cost-effective treatment for the Ukrainian population under conditions of economic stability, cost-effectiveness threshold growth, or rituximab price negotiations.
机译:这项研究的目的是从卫生保健的角度评估在未治疗和难治性/复发性乌克兰慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者中向氟达拉滨和环磷酰胺方案(FCR vs FC)添加利妥昔单抗的成本效益。建立了具有三个健康状态和1个月周期时间的决策分析马尔可夫队列模型,并在生命周期范围内运行。来自两项跨国,前瞻性,开放标签的3期研究的数据用于评估患者的生存率。虽然从英国的数据中概括了公用事业,但仍应用了当地资源利用和疾病相关的治疗,住院和副作用成本。进行了替代方案来评估乌克兰普通人群较低的预期寿命对未接受治疗的患者的增量成本效益比(ICER)的影响。进行了单向,双向和概率敏感性分析,以评估结果的稳健性。对于未经治疗的患者,FCR与FC治疗慢性淋巴细胞性白血病的ICER(美元)为每质量调整生命年8,870美元,对于顽固性/复发性患者为1,1,056美元。当将生存数据修改为乌克兰普通人群较低的预期寿命时,未接受治疗的患者的ICER高于13,000美元。该值高于乌克兰目前人均国内生产总值的三倍。敏感性分析表明,利妥昔单抗的成本影响很大,公用事业差异对ICER的影响中等。此外,概率敏感性分析表明,对于难治性/复发性患者,FCR具有成本效益的可能性比未接受过治疗的患者高,如果阈值高于15,000美元,则接近。在经济稳定,成本效益阈值增长或利妥昔单抗价格谈判的条件下,利妥昔单抗治疗的国家覆盖范围可被视为对乌克兰人口具有成本效益的治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号