首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Central European Journal of Urology >The comparison of the influence between two different bowel preparation methods on sepsis after prostate biopsies
【2h】

The comparison of the influence between two different bowel preparation methods on sepsis after prostate biopsies

机译:两种不同肠准备方法对前列腺活检后败血症影响的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

IntroductionTransrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) guided prostate needle biopsy has been performed to diagnose and stage prostate cancer for many years. There are many different bowel preparation protocols to diminish the infectious complications, but there is no standardized consensus among urologists. Therefore, we aimed to assess two different bowel preparation methods on the rate of infectious complications in patients who underwent TRUS–guided prostate biopsy.
机译:简介多年来经直肠超声(TRUS)引导的前列腺穿刺活检可诊断和分期前列腺癌。有很多不同的肠道准备方案可以减少感染并发症,但泌尿科医师之间尚无标准化共识。因此,我们旨在评估两种不同的肠道准备方法,以对接受TRUS引导的前列腺活检的患者的感染并发症发生率进行评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号