[ Objective] To investigate the effects of two different bowel preparation methods in the prevention of the complications following prostate biopsy. [ Methods] All of 98 patients with suspected prostate cancer were divided into A and B groups. All patients received routine bowel preparation for 2 ～ 3 days, took oral antibiotics, began fasting after 8 the night before. The patients in group A received oral cathartic agent but not enema, while those in group B received oral cathartic agent and routine cleansing enema in the morning before biopsy. [ Results] In group A,63.6％ patients (35 of 55 ) had complications,including 2 patients with fever(T ＞38 ℃ ) and chill (3.6％) ;in group B,67.4％ patients (29 of 43) had complications, including 2 patients with fever (4.7 ％ ), one of them expressing chill (2.3％). [ Conclusion ] The prebiopsy enemas might not decrease overall rates of complication in patients with prostate biopsy.%[目的]探讨两种肠道准备方法对前列腺穿刺活检术后并发症发生率的影响.[方法]将2008年12月～2010年10月疑前列腺癌并行穿刺活检患者98例分为A、B两组.A组(n=55)术前不行灌肠,术前夜口服导泻剂;B组(n=43)术前夜口服导泻剂,术晨灌肠.两组患者术前2～3 d均行常规肠道准备、口服抗感染药物,术前晚禁食.[结果]A组患者中35例出现并发症(63.6%),发热(T＞38℃)伴寒战2例(3.6%);B组43例患者中29例出现并发症(67.4%),发热2例(4.7%),出现寒战者1例(2.3%).[结论]术前灌肠可能不会减少前列腺活检患者术后并发症发生率.
展开▼
