首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases: Journal of the COPD Foundation >Efficacy of Formoterol Fumarate Delivered by Metered Dose Inhaler Using Co-Suspension™ Delivery Technology Versus Foradil® Aerolizer® in Moderate-To-Severe COPD: A Randomized Dose-Ranging Study
【2h】

Efficacy of Formoterol Fumarate Delivered by Metered Dose Inhaler Using Co-Suspension™ Delivery Technology Versus Foradil® Aerolizer® in Moderate-To-Severe COPD: A Randomized Dose-Ranging Study

机译:使用Co-Suspension™输送技术通过定量吸入器输送的富马酸福莫特罗的疗效与Foradil®Aerolizer®在中度至重度COPD中的疗效:一项随机剂量范围研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Co-Suspension™ Delivery Technology offers a novel pharmaceutical platform for inhaled drug therapy. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose study () evaluated the efficacy of a range of doses for formoterol fumarate (FF) delivered using Co-Suspension delivery technology via a pressurized metered dose inhaler (MDI) versus placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Secondary objectives included determination of non-inferior efficacy and systemic exposure compared with open-label Foradil® 12 μg (Foradil® Aerolizer®; formoterol fumarate dry powder inhaler). >Methods: Patients received each of the 6 study treatments (FF MDI [7.2, 9.6 and 19.2μg], placebo MDI and open-label Foradil® [12 and 24µg]), separated by 3–10 days. Spirometry was performed 60 and 30 minutes prior to and at regular intervals up to 12 hours post-administration of study drug. The primary outcome measure was the change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) area under the curve between 0 and 12 hours (AUC0-12) relative to test day baseline. >Results: A total of 50 patients were randomized to study treatment sequences. All doses of FF MDI demonstrated superiority to placebo (p<0.0001) and non-inferiority to Foradil® 12μg, on bronchodilator outcome measures. No serious adverse events were reported during the study. >Conclusions: This study demonstrates non-inferiority of bronchodilator response and bioequivalent exposure of FF MDI 9.6μg to Foradil® 12μg, with both agents exhibiting a similar safety profile in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. This study supports the selection of FF MDI 9.6µg for further evaluation in Phase III trials.
机译:>背景: Co-Suspension™递送技术为吸入式药物治疗提供了一个新颖的药物平台。这项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照,单剂量研究()评估了使用Co-Suspension输送技术通过加压计量吸入器(MDI)与安慰剂联合使用的富马酸福莫特罗(FF)的一系列剂量的疗效。中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的患者。次要目标包括确定与开放标签的Foradil ® 12μg(Foradil ® Aerolizer ®;福莫特罗富马酸盐)相比的非劣效药和全身暴露干粉吸入器)。 >方法:患者分别接受6种研究治疗药物(FF MDI [7.2、9.6和19.2μg],安慰剂MDI和开放标签的Foradil ® [12和24μg]) ,相隔3-10天。在服用研究药物之前和之后的12小时内,定期进行肺活量测定,时间为60分钟和30分钟。主要结局指标是相对于测试日基线,在0到12小时(AUC0-12)之间的曲线下,在1秒(FEV1)区域内的强制呼气量的变化。 >结果:将总共50例患者随机分组以研究治疗顺序。在支气管扩张剂疗效指标上,所有剂量的FF MDI均优于安慰剂(p <0.0001),不劣于Foradil ®12μg。研究期间未报告严重不良事件。 >结论:该研究证明FF MDI9.6μgFF MDI对Foradil ®12μg的支气管扩张剂反应无不良影响,在中度患者中两种药物的安全性相似-重度COPD。这项研究支持选择FF MDI 9.6µg进行III期临床试验的进一步评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号