首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Chonnam Medical Journal >Intraoperative Observation of the Degree and Pattern of Urine Leakage before Adjustment of the Mesh during a Transobturator Tape Procedure
【2h】

Intraoperative Observation of the Degree and Pattern of Urine Leakage before Adjustment of the Mesh during a Transobturator Tape Procedure

机译:经闭孔带扎术中调整网片前的术中尿液渗漏程度和模式的术中观察

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Most intraoperative provocative tests previously reported were performed after mesh adjustment to confirm the absence of urine leakage. Instead, our test was performed before adjustment of the mesh to control the tape tension after observing the pattern of the urine leakage. We studied whether this method had an effect on the success rate of transobturator tape (TOT) procedures. A total of 96 patients were included: 47 patients underwent TOT procedures without intraoperative testing (Group I) and 49 patients underwent TOT procedures with testing (Group II). Bladder filling was performed with at least 300 ml of normal saline during the test. After observing the pattern of the urine leakage before adjustment of the mesh by coughing or manual pressure on the suprapubic area, we controlled the mesh tension. In Group I, which did not undergo the intraoperative test, the Valsalva leak-point pressure, cough leak-point pressure, preoperative and postoperative peak flow velocity (Qmax), and postvoiding residual urine (PVR) were 86.46 cmH2O, 101.91 cmH2O, 20.82 ml/s, 22.74 ml/s, 19.77 ml, and 45.98 ml, respectively. Changes in the postoperative and preoperative Qmax and PVR were 1.92 ml/s and 26.21 ml, respectively. In Group II, in which the test was applied, the corresponding results were 85.50 cmH2O, 100.45 cmH2O, 25.60 ml/s, 26.90 ml/s, 17.16 ml, and 29.67 ml, respectively. Changes in the postoperative and preoperative Qmax and PVR were 1.3 ml/s and 12.51 ml, respectively. The two groups showed no significant differences in any of the variables. In Group I, the cure and improvement rates were 70.2% and 27.7%, respectively. In Group II, the rates were 91.8% and 8.2%, respectively. Group II had a significantly higher success rate than Group I (p value= 0.011). In the univariable logistic regression analysis, Group II exhibited a higher odds ratio (4.771) than Group I in terms of cure rate, and Group II had a higher success rate than Group I (p value=0.011). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, Group II exhibited a higher odds ratio (4.700) than Group I in terms of cure rate under calculation of the variables (namely, age, hypertension, preoperative Qmax, and PVR), and the cure rate of Group II was verified to be significantly higher than that of Group I (p value=0.019). We suggest that our test is an effective method to confirm whether adequate tension is being applied to the tape. Our method presents some advantages in that surgeons can control and adjust the tension of the mesh after observing the degree and pattern of the urine leakage.
机译:先前报道的大多数术中激发试验是在调整网孔后进行的,以确认尿液渗漏的情况。取而代之的是,我们在观察尿液泄漏模式后,在调整网孔以控制胶带张力之前进行了测试。我们研究了这种方法是否对经闭孔胶带(TOT)手术的成功率有影响。总共包括96名患者:47例未进行术中测试的TOT程序(第一组)和49例进行了测试的TOT程序(第二组)。在试验期间,用至少300 ml生理盐水进行膀胱充盈。在通过咳嗽或耻骨上区域的手动压力调整网片之前,观察尿液渗漏的模式后,我们控制了网片的张力。在未进行术中测试的I组中,Valsalva的漏点压力,咳嗽的漏点压力,术前和术后的峰值流速(Qmax)和术后遗留尿液(PVR)分别为86.46 cmH2O,101.91 cmH2O,20.82 ml / s,22.74 ml / s,19.77 ml和45.98 ml。术后Qmax和PVR的变化分别为1.92 ml / s和26.21 ml。在进行测试的第二组中,相应的结果分别为85.50 cmH2O,100.45 cmH2O,25.60 ml / s,26.90 ml / s,17.16 ml和29.67 ml。术后Qmax和PVR的变化分别为1.3 ml / s和12.51 ml。两组在任何变量上均无显着差异。在第一组中,治愈率和改善率分别为70.2%和27.7%。在第二组中,该比率分别为91.8%和8.2%。第二组的成功率明显高于第一组(p值= 0.011)。在单变量logistic回归分析中,就治愈率而言,第二组的胜算率(4.771)比第一组更高,第二组的成功率高于第一组(p值= 0.011)。在多变量logistic回归分析中,在计算变量(即年龄,高血压,术前Qmax和PVR)以及组治愈率方面,第二组的治愈率比第一组更高(4.700)。证实II组明显高于I组(p值= 0.019)。我们建议我们的测试是一种有效的方法,以确认是否在磁带上施加了足够的张力。我们的方法具有一些优点,即在观察尿液渗漏的程度和方式后,外科医生可以控制和调节网孔的张力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号