首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Cardiology >The Risk of Atrial Fibrillation With Ivabradine Treatment: A Meta‐analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of More Than 40000 Patients
【2h】

The Risk of Atrial Fibrillation With Ivabradine Treatment: A Meta‐analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of More Than 40000 Patients

机译:伊伐布雷定治疗引起心房颤动的风险:荟萃分析和试验序贯分析法对超过40000例患者进行分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recent trials reported that risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increased in patients using ivabradine compared with controls. We performed this meta‐analysis to investigate the risk of AF association with ivabradine treatment on the basis of data obtained from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for RCTs that comprised >100 patients. The incidence of AF was assessed. We obtained data from European Medicines Agency (EMA) scientific reports for the RCTs in which the incidence of AF was not reported. We used trial sequential analysis (TSA) to provide information on when we had reached firm evidence of new AF based on a 15% relative risk increase (RRI) in ivabradine treatment. Three RCTs and 1 EMA overall oral safety set (OOSS) pooled analysis (included 5 style="fixed-case">RCTs) were included in the meta‐analysis (N = 40 437). The incidence of style="fixed-case">AF was 5.34% in patients using ivabradine and 4.56% in placebo. There was significantly higher incidence of style="fixed-case">AF (24% style="fixed-case">RRI) in the ivabradine group when compared with placebo before ( style="fixed-case">RR: 1.24, 95% confidence interval: 1.08‐1.42, style="italic-in-any-context">P = 0.003, style="italic-in-any-context"> style="fixed-case">I 1980 = 53%) and after excluding style="fixed-case">OOSS ( style="fixed-case">RR: 1.24, 95% confidence interval: 1.06‐1.44, style="italic-in-any-context">P = 0.008). In the style="fixed-case">TSA, the cumulative z‐curve crossed both the traditional boundary ( style="italic-in-any-context">P = 0.05) and the trial sequential monitoring boundary, indicating firm evidence for ≥15% increase in ivabradine treatment when compared with placebo. Study results indicate that style="fixed-case">AF is more common in the ivabradine group (24% style="fixed-case">RRI) than in controls.
机译:最近的试验报道,与对照组相比,使用伊伐布雷定的患者发生房颤(AF)的风险增加。我们根据来自随机对照试验(RCT)的数据进行了这项荟萃分析,以研究房颤与伊伐布雷定治疗相关的风险。我们在PubMed,EMBASE,Scopus和Cochrane库中搜索了包括100多名患者的RCT。评估房颤的发生率。我们从欧洲医学机构(EMA)的RCT的科学报告中获得了数据,但未报告房颤的发生率。我们使用试验序贯分析(TSA)来提供信息,基于伊伐布雷定治疗中相对危险度增加(RRI)15%的情况,我们何时获得新房颤的确凿证据。荟萃分析(N = CT40 437)包括3项RCT和1项EMA总口服安全性(OOSS)合并分析(包括5项 style =“ fixed-case”> RCT )。使用伊伐布雷定的患者中 style =“ fixed-case”> AF 的发生率为5.34%,而使用安慰剂的患者为4.56%。与安慰剂治疗前相比,伊伐布雷定组中 style =“ fixed-case”> AF 的发生率显着更高(24% style =“ fixed-case”> RRI )( style =“ fixed-case”> RR :1.24,95%置信区间:1.08-1.42, style =“ italic-in-any-context”> P = 0.003,< span style =“ italic-in-any-context”> style =“ fixed-case”> I 1980 = 53%),并且在排除 style =“ fixed-case”>之后OOSS ( style =“ fixed-case”> RR :1.24,95%置信区间:1.06-1.44, style =“ italic-in-any-context”> P = 0.008)。在 style =“ fixed-case”> TSA 中,累积的z曲线同时跨越了传统边界( style =“ italic-in-any-context”> P = 0.05 )和试验性连续监测范围,表明与安慰剂相比,伊伐布雷定治疗增加了≥15%的确凿证据。研究结果表明,与对照组相比,伊伐布雷定组中 style =“ fixed-case”> AF 更常见(24% style =“ fixed-case”> RRI )。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号