首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >Objective Structured Assessments of Technical Skills (OSATS) Does Not Assess the Quality of the Surgical Result Effectively
【2h】

Objective Structured Assessments of Technical Skills (OSATS) Does Not Assess the Quality of the Surgical Result Effectively

机译:客观的技术技能结构评估(OSATS)无法有效评估手术结果的质量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundPerformance assessment in skills training is ideally based on objective, reliable, and clinically relevant indicators of success. The Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) is a reliable and valid tool that has been increasingly used in orthopaedic skills training. It uses a global rating approach to structure expert evaluation of technical skills with the experts working from a list of operative competencies that are each rated on a 5-point Likert scale anchored by behavioral descriptors. Given the observational nature of its scoring, the OSATS might not effectively assess the quality of surgical results.
机译:背景技术技能培训中的绩效评估理想地基于客观,可靠和临床相关的成功指标。技术技能的客观结构评估(OSATS)是一种可靠且有效的工具,在骨科技能培训中已越来越多地使用它。它使用全球评分方法来构建专家对技术技能的评估,专家从一系列操作能力中进行工作,每个操作能力均以行为描述符为基础的5点李克特量表进行评分。考虑到评分的观察性,OSATS可能无法有效评估手术结果的质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号