首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Sports Science Medicine >Safety Evaluation of Protective Equipment for the Forearm Shin Hand and Foot in Taekwondo
【2h】

Safety Evaluation of Protective Equipment for the Forearm Shin Hand and Foot in Taekwondo

机译:跆拳道前臂胫骨手足防护设备的安全性评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objective of the study was to evaluate and compare different brands of forearm, shin, hand and foot protective equipment used in Taekwondo. The most popular brands of large forearm, shin, hand and foot protectors (D®, A®, K ®), approved by the World Taekwondo and Korean Taekwondo Association, were examined. A drop test was used to test the protective equipment using impact levels of 3J, 9J, 12J and 15J for the forearm and shin guards, and 3J and 9J for the hand and foot protectors. The protective equipment was hit ten times from each of the designated drop heights. The drop test is described in the European standards manual of protective equipment for martial arts (SRPS EN 13277-2). The maximum force (MF) and impulse were lowest for brand K® (2610.3 ± 1474.1 N), and brand A® (9.6 ± 3.1 Ns), respectively, for the forearm guards; for brand A® (2053.4 ± 1267.1 N) and brand K® (9.8 ± 3.5 Ns), respectively, for the shin guards; for brand K® (4486.5 ± 1718.4 N), and brand A® (6.3 ± 1.1 Ns), respectively for the hand protectors; and for brand A® (3733.7 ± 2465.3 N), and brand D® (6.8 ± 0.6 Ns), respectively, for the foot protectors. For the forearm guard brand and impact level, there was a significant interaction effect for the MF (F=42.44, η2=.677, p <0.001) and impulse (F = 33.97, η2 = 0.626, p <0.001). Based on the MF, brand K® performed the best for the forearm guards and hand protectors, and brand A®, for the shin guards and foot protectors. The best results for the impulse were for brand A® (forearm guards and hand protectors), brand K® (shin guards) and brand D® (foot protectors).Key points class="unordered" style="list-style-type:disc">The best results for the maximum force were for brand K® (forearm guards and hand protectors), and brand A® (shin guards and foot protectors).The best results for the impulse were for brand A® (forearm guards and hand protectors), brand K® (shin guards) and brand D® (foot protectors).To prevent severe injuries, the protective equipment needs to be substantially improved (Even if the impact level is increasingly more than 3J, the resulting impact forces need to be reduced to <2000 N).It recommends the development of more stringent protective equipment standards criteria to ensure the safety of Taekwondo athletes.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估和比较跆拳道中使用的不同品牌的前臂,胫骨,手足防护设备。世界认可的最受欢迎的大型前臂,胫,手和脚保护器品牌(D ®,A ®,K ®)检查了跆拳道和韩国跆拳道协会。跌落测试用于测试防护设备,前臂和胫骨防护装置的冲击等级为3J,9J,12J和15J,手和脚保护装置的冲击等级为3J和9J。从每个指定的跌落高度击中防护设备十次。跌落测试在武术保护设备的欧洲标准手册(SRPS EN 13277-2)中进行了描述。 K ®品牌的最大力(MF)和冲量最低(2610.3±1474.1 N),A ®品牌的最大力(9.6±3.1 Ns)分别最低。前臂警卫;对于护胫,分别用于品牌A ®(2053.4±1267.1 N)和品牌K ®(9.8±3.5 Ns);用于护手器的品牌K ®(4486.5±1718.4 N)和品牌A ®(6.3±1.1 Ns);分别用于脚保护器的品牌A ®(3733.7±2465.3 N)和品牌D ®(6.8±0.6 Ns)。对于前臂后卫的品牌和影响程度,MF(F = 42.44,η 2 =。677,p <0.001)和冲动(F = 33.97,η 2 = 0.626,p <0.001)。基于MF,品牌K ®在前臂护具和护手器中表现最好,而品牌A ®在护胫和护脚器中表现最好。冲动的最佳结果是品牌A ®(前卫和护手),品牌K ®(后卫)和D ®(脚套)。要点 class =“ unordered” style =“ list-style-type:disc”> <!-list-behavior = unordered prefix-word = mark-type = disc max-label-size = 0-> 最大力的最佳结果是品牌K ®(前卫和护手)和品牌A ®(后卫和 冲动的最佳结果是品牌A ®(前卫和护手),品牌K ®(后卫) )和品牌D ®(脚部保护器)。 为防止严重伤害,必须对防护设备进行重大改进(即使冲击水平逐渐超过3J,因此需要将冲击力减小至<2000 N)。 建议制定更严格的防护设备标准标准,以确保安全性。跆拳道运动员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号