首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Sports Science Medicine >Effects of Vibration and Non-Vibration Foam Rolling on Recovery after Exercise with Induced Muscle Damage
【2h】

Effects of Vibration and Non-Vibration Foam Rolling on Recovery after Exercise with Induced Muscle Damage

机译:振动和非振动泡沫滚动对运动引起的肌肉损伤后恢复的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We aimed to compare the effects between non-vibration foam rolling (NVFR) and vibration foam rolling (VFR) on visual analogic scale (VAS), pressure pain threshold (PPT), oxygen saturation (SmO2), countermovement jump (CMJ) and hip and knee range of movement (ROM) after eliciting muscle damage through eccentric acute exercise using an inertial flywheel. Thirty-eight healthy volunteers (32 men, 6 women; aged 22.2±3.2 years) were randomly assigned in a counter-balanced fashion to either a VFR or NVFR protocol group. All participants performed a 10x10 (sets x repetitions) eccentric squat protocol to induce muscle damage. The protocols were administered 48-h post-exercise, measuring VAS, PPT, SmO2, CMJ and ROM, before and immediately post-treatment. The treatment technique was repeated on both legs for 1 minute for a total of five sets, with a 30-s rest between sets. The VFR group showed substantially greater improvements (likely to very likely) in the passive VAS (VFR -30.2%, 90% CI -66.2 to -12.8) with chances for lower, similar or greater VAS compared with the NVFR group of 82%, 14% and 4%, respectively and passive extension hip joint ROM (VFR 9.3%, 90% CI 0.2–19.2) with chances for lower, similar or greater ROM compared with the NVFR group of 78%, 21% and 1%, respectively. For intragroup changes, we observed substantial improvements in VAS (p=.05), lateral vastus, rectus femoris and medial vastus PPT. The results suggest that the VFR group achieved greater short-term benefits in pain perception and passive extension hip joint ROM. Both protocols were effective in improving PPT, SmO2, CMJ and knee joint ROM. The enhanced improvement in VAS and hip ROM measures could have significant implications for VFR treatment.Key points class="unordered" style="list-style-type:disc">The vibration foam rolling group showed substantially greater improvements in pain perception and passive hip extension ROM.Both groups of foam rolling improve lateral vastus, rectus femoris and medial vastus pressure pain threshold, oxygen saturation and countermovement jump.Future studies and clinical practice should consider these data with delayed-onset muscle soreness.
机译:我们旨在比较无振动泡沫滚动(NVFR)和振动泡沫滚动(VFR)对视觉类比标度(VAS),压力疼痛阈值(PPT),氧饱和度(SmO2),反运动跳跃(CMJ)和臀部的影响惯性飞轮通过偏心急速锻炼引起肌肉损伤后的膝盖和膝关节活动范围(ROM)。 38名健康志愿者(32名男性,6名女性;年龄22.2±3.2岁)被随机分配到VFR或NVFR方案组。所有参与者都进行了10x10(组x重复)的偏心深蹲实验,以引起肌肉损伤。协议在运动后48小时进行,测量VAS,PPT,SmO2,CMJ和ROM,然后进行治疗。双腿重复治疗技术1分钟,共五组,每组之间休息30秒钟。 VFR组在被动式VAS方面显示出明显更大的改善(很有可能)(VFR -30.2%,90%CI -66.2至-12.8),与NVFR组的82%相比,VAS的可能性更低,相似或更大。被动伸展髋关节ROM(VFR 9.3%,90%CI 0.2-19.2)分别为14%和4%,与NVFR组分别为78%,21%和1%相比,ROM更低,相似或更大的机会。对于组内变化,我们观察到VAS(p = .05),外侧股静脉,股直肌和内侧股动脉PPT有了实质性改善。结果表明,VFR组在疼痛感知和被动伸展髋关节ROM方面获得了更大的短期收益。两种方案均有效改善PPT,SmO2,CMJ和膝关节ROM。 VAS和髋部ROM测量方法的改进可能会对VFR治疗产生重大影响。要点 class =“ unordered” style =“ list-style-type:disc”> <!-list-behavior = unordered prefix-word = mark-type = disc max-label-size = 0-> 振动泡沫滚动组在疼痛感知和被动髋关节伸展ROM方面显示出明显更大的改善。 泡沫滚动两组均得到改善外侧外侧股骨,股直肌和内侧内侧股骨压力痛阈值,氧饱和度和反向运动跳跃。 未来的研究和临床实践应考虑这些数据与迟发性肌肉酸痛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号