首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Sports Science Medicine >Are Change of Direction Speed and Reactive Agility Useful for Determining the Optimal Field Position for Young Soccer Players?
【2h】

Are Change of Direction Speed and Reactive Agility Useful for Determining the Optimal Field Position for Young Soccer Players?

机译:方向速度的变化和反应敏捷性对确定年轻足球运动员的最佳场位有用吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Change Of Direction Speed (CODS) and Reactive Agility (RA) are two determining factors in the ability of young soccer players. We aimed to verify if CODS and RA could be useful in order to establish the best young soccer player field position. Ninety-two elite soccer players (15.18 ± 1.21 years, weight 59.18 ± 9.93, height 1.72 ± 0.08, BMI 19.76 ± 2.22), belonging to two youth categories from the Italian First and Second Divisions, volunteered in this study. The participants included 32 defenders (15.06 ± 0.80 years), 37 midfielders (15.11 ± 0.84 years) and 23 forwards (15.48 ± 1.16 years), and they underwent two tests, each one performed in two different ways: the Y-Agility Test, carried out in a planned and reactive mode (Y-PLAN and Y-REAC), and the Illinois for Change of Direction Test (ICODT) performed with and without the ball. REAC-INDEX, which represents the index of reactivity, was calculated as Y-REAC minus Y-PLAN. The difference between the two scores of ICODT (ICODT with the ball minus ICODT without the ball) represents the TECHN-INDEX. Multivariate Analysis of Variances (MANOVA) was used to evaluate significant differences among all position groups, for all the test scores. MANOVA showed no significant differences in test scores or in TECHN-INDEX among the groups, except for the forwards, who were significantly more reactive than the defenders (p < 0.05). The strong and significant Pearson’s Correlation between ICODT with and without the ball (p < 0.01) demonstrated that physical and technical preparations have the same relevance in all positions. No significant differences were found among players in different field positions for CODS and RA performances, both with and without the ball. This study does not recommend to use RA and CODS as indicators to assign the players roles in youth soccer.Key points class="unordered" style="list-style-type:disc">Agility is a key skill required for soccer success, and it is based on greater levels of motor control, when compared to pre-planned CODS.No significant differences amongst players in different field positions for CODS and Agility performances were found.This study does not recommend to use Agility and CODS as indicators to assign the players roles in youth soccer.
机译:方向变化速度(CODS)和反应敏捷性(RA)是年轻足球运动员能力的两个决定性因素。我们旨在验证CODS和RA是否对建立最佳的年轻足球运动员场地位置有用。来自意大利第一和第二分区的两个青年类别的92名精英足球运动员(15.18±1.21岁,体重59.18±9.93,身高1.72±0.08,BMI 19.76±2.22)是本研究的志愿者。参与者包括32名后卫(15.06±0.80年),37名中场球员(15.11±0.84年)和23名前锋(15.48±1.16年),他们接受了两项测试,每种测试均以两种不同的方式进行:Y敏捷测试,以计划和反应模式(Y-PLAN和Y-REAC)进行,伊利诺伊州方向变化测试(ICODT)在有球和无球的情况下进行。表示反应性指数的REAC-INDEX计算为Y-REAC减去Y-PLAN。 ICODT的两个得分之间的差值(带球的ICODT减去不带球的ICODT)代表TECHN-INDEX。对于所有测试分数,均采用方差多元分析(MANOVA)评估所有职位组之间的显着差异。除前锋外,MANOVA在组别之间的测试成绩或TECHN-INDEX上均无显着差异,前锋比后卫更具反应性(p <0.05)。有球和无球的ICODT之间强烈而显着的Pearson相关性(p <0.01)表明,物理和技术准备在所有位置上都具有相同的相关性。在有球和无球的情况下,在不同场位的球员在CODS和RA表现上都没有发现显着差异。这项研究不建议使用RA和CODS作为指标来分配青年足球运动员的角色。要点 class =“ unordered” style =“ list-style-type:disc”> <!-list-behavior =无序前缀词=标记类型=光盘最大标签大小= 0-> 敏捷性是足球成功的关键技能,与预先计划的相比,它基于更高水平的运动控制 在不同领域的球员之间,对于CODS和敏捷性表现没有明显差异。 本研究不建议使用敏捷性和CODS作为指标来分配球员角色在青少年足球比赛中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号